Random-start GnRH antagonist for emergency fertility preservation: a self-controlled trial
- PMID: 25709506
- PMCID: PMC4332315
- DOI: 10.2147/IJWH.S66743
Random-start GnRH antagonist for emergency fertility preservation: a self-controlled trial
Abstract
The aim of this study is to evaluate the feasibility and safety of random-start controlled ovarian hyperstimulation (COH) for emergency fertility preservation, regardless of the phase of the menstrual cycle. A self-controlled pilot clinical trial (NCT01385332) was performed in an acute-care teaching hospital and in two private reproductive centers in Barcelona, Spain. Eleven egg donors participated in the study. Two random-start gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonist protocols were assessed in which ganirelix was initiated on either day 10 (protocol B) or on day 20 (protocol C) of the menstrual cycle and was continued until estradiol levels were below 60 pg/dL. These protocols were compared with a standard protocol (protocol A). The main outcome of interest was the number of metaphase 2 oocytes retrieved. Results from this study show that the number of mature oocytes retrieved was comparable across the different protocols (14.3±4.6 in the standard protocol versus 13.0±9.1 and 13.2±5.2 in protocols B and C, respectively; values expressed as mean ± standard deviation). The mean number of days needed for a GnRH antagonist to lower estradiol levels, as well as the ongoing pregnancy rates, were also similar when protocols B (stimulation in follicular phase) and C (stimulation on luteal phase) were compared with protocol A (standard stimulation). GnRH antagonists can be effectively used for random-start controlled ovarian hyperstimulation with an ovarian response similar to that of standard protocols, and the antagonists appear suitable for emergency fertility preservation in cancer patients.
Keywords: GnRH antagonists; cancer patients; controlled ovarian hyperstimulation; emergency fertility preservation.
Figures


Similar articles
-
Initiation of ovarian stimulation independent of the menstrual cycle: a case-control study.Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2013 Oct;288(4):901-4. doi: 10.1007/s00404-013-2794-z. Epub 2013 Apr 3. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2013. PMID: 23545834 Clinical Trial.
-
The prevention of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome.J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2014 Nov;36(11):1024-1033. doi: 10.1016/S1701-2163(15)30417-5. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2014. PMID: 25574681 Review. English, French.
-
A randomized comparison of two ovarian stimulation protocols with gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonist cotreatment for in vitro fertilization commencing recombinant follicle-stimulating hormone on cycle day 2 or 5 with the standard long GnRH agonist protocol.J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2003 Jan;88(1):166-73. doi: 10.1210/jc.2002-020788. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2003. PMID: 12519847 Clinical Trial.
-
Does the estradiol level on the day of human chorionic gonadotropin administration predict the clinical outcome of controlled ovarian hyperstimulation?Clin Exp Obstet Gynecol. 2014;41(6):709-12. Clin Exp Obstet Gynecol. 2014. PMID: 25551969
-
Gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonists for assisted reproductive techniques: are there clinical differences between agents?Drugs. 2004;64(6):563-75. doi: 10.2165/00003495-200464060-00001. Drugs. 2004. PMID: 15018588 Review.
Cited by
-
Female patients with lymphoma demonstrate diminished ovarian reserve even before initiation of chemotherapy when compared with healthy controls and patients with other malignancies.J Assist Reprod Genet. 2016 May;33(5):657-662. doi: 10.1007/s10815-016-0689-1. Epub 2016 Mar 4. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2016. PMID: 26943918 Free PMC article.
-
Female Oncofertility: Current Understandings, Therapeutic Approaches, Controversies, and Future Perspectives.J Clin Med. 2021 Dec 3;10(23):5690. doi: 10.3390/jcm10235690. J Clin Med. 2021. PMID: 34884393 Free PMC article. Review.
-
IVF for fertility preservation in breast cancer patients--efficacy and safety issues.J Assist Reprod Genet. 2015 Aug;32(8):1171-8. doi: 10.1007/s10815-015-0519-x. Epub 2015 Jul 1. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2015. PMID: 26126877 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Ethical, moral and other aspects related to fertility preservation in cancer patients.JBRA Assist Reprod. 2017 Feb 1;21(1):45-48. doi: 10.5935/1518-0557.20170011. JBRA Assist Reprod. 2017. PMID: 28333032 Free PMC article.
-
Oocyte and embryo cryopreservation before gonadotoxic treatments: Principles of safe ovarian stimulation, a systematic review.Womens Health (Lond). 2022 Jan-Dec;18:17455065221074886. doi: 10.1177/17455065221074886. Womens Health (Lond). 2022. PMID: 35130799 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Martínez F, Devesa M, Coroleu B, et al. Cancer and fertility preservation: Barcelona consensus meeting. Gynecol Endocrinol. 2013;29(4):285–291. - PubMed
-
- American Cancer Society . Breast Cancer Facts and Figures 2009–2010. Atlanta, GA: American Cancer Society Inc; 2009. [Accessed October 10, 2013]. Available from: http://www.cancer.org/acs/groups/content/@nho/documents/document/f861009...
-
- Pollán M, Michelena MJ, Ardanaz E, Izquierdo A, Sánchez-Pérez MJ, Torrella A, Breast Cancer Working Group Breast cancer incidence in Spain before, during and after the implementation of screening programmes. Ann Oncol. 2010;21(Suppl 3):iii97–iii102. - PubMed
-
- Partridge AH, Gelber S, Peppercorn J, et al. Web-based survey of fertility issues in young women with breast cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2004;22(20):4174–4183. - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources