Current concepts of bone tissue engineering for craniofacial bone defect repair
- PMID: 25709750
- PMCID: PMC4329034
- DOI: 10.1055/s-0034-1393724
Current concepts of bone tissue engineering for craniofacial bone defect repair
Abstract
Craniofacial fractures and bony defects are common causes of morbidity and contribute to increasing health care costs. Successful regeneration of bone requires the concomitant processes of osteogenesis and neovascularization. Current methods of repair and reconstruction include rigid fixation, grafting, and free tissue transfer. However, these methods carry innate complications, including plate extrusion, nonunion, graft/flap failure, and donor site morbidity. Recent research efforts have focused on using stem cells and synthetic scaffolds to heal critical-sized bone defects similar to those sustained from traumatic injury or ablative oncologic surgery. Growth factors can be used to augment both osteogenesis and neovascularization across these defects. Many different growth factor delivery techniques and scaffold compositions have been explored yet none have emerged as the universally accepted standard. In this review, we will discuss the recent literature regarding the use of stem cells, growth factors, and synthetic scaffolds as alternative methods of craniofacial fracture repair.
Keywords: bone regeneration; fracture; mandible defect; synthetic implant.
Similar articles
-
Repair of a critical size defect in the rat mandible using allogenic type I collagen.J Craniofac Surg. 2001 Nov;12(6):573-9. doi: 10.1097/00001665-200111000-00015. J Craniofac Surg. 2001. PMID: 11711826
-
Stem cells, growth factors and scaffolds in craniofacial regenerative medicine.Genes Dis. 2016 Mar;3(1):56-71. doi: 10.1016/j.gendis.2015.09.004. Epub 2015 Oct 17. Genes Dis. 2016. PMID: 27239485 Free PMC article.
-
The combination of nano-calcium sulfate/platelet rich plasma gel scaffold with BMP2 gene-modified mesenchymal stem cells promotes bone regeneration in rat critical-sized calvarial defects.Stem Cell Res Ther. 2017 May 25;8(1):122. doi: 10.1186/s13287-017-0574-6. Stem Cell Res Ther. 2017. PMID: 28545565 Free PMC article.
-
Reconstruction of Craniomaxillofacial Bone Defects Using Tissue-Engineering Strategies with Injectable and Non-Injectable Scaffolds.J Funct Biomater. 2017 Nov 20;8(4):49. doi: 10.3390/jfb8040049. J Funct Biomater. 2017. PMID: 29156629 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Osteogenesis and angiogenesis: the potential for engineering bone.Eur Cell Mater. 2008 May 2;15:100-14. doi: 10.22203/ecm.v015a08. Eur Cell Mater. 2008. PMID: 18454418 Review.
Cited by
-
Assessment of Hedgehog Signaling Pathway Activation for Craniofacial Bone Regeneration in a Critical-Sized Rat Mandibular Defect.JAMA Facial Plast Surg. 2019 Mar 1;21(2):110-117. doi: 10.1001/jamafacial.2018.1508. JAMA Facial Plast Surg. 2019. PMID: 30520953 Free PMC article.
-
A Biofabrication Strategy for a Custom-Shaped, Non-Synthetic Bone Graft Precursor with a Prevascularized Tissue Shell.Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2022 Mar 9;10:838415. doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2022.838415. eCollection 2022. Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2022. PMID: 35356783 Free PMC article.
-
Fabrication and physicochemical characterization of porous composite microgranules with selenium oxyanions and risedronate sodium for potential applications in bone tumors.Int J Nanomedicine. 2017 Aug 7;12:5633-5642. doi: 10.2147/IJN.S140935. eCollection 2017. Int J Nanomedicine. 2017. PMID: 28848343 Free PMC article.
-
An update on the Application of Nanotechnology in Bone Tissue Engineering.Open Orthop J. 2016 Dec 30;10:836-848. doi: 10.2174/1874325001610010836. eCollection 2016. Open Orthop J. 2016. PMID: 28217209 Free PMC article.
-
An optimized 3D-printed perfusion bioreactor for homogeneous cell seeding in bone substitute scaffolds for future chairside applications.Sci Rep. 2021 Nov 15;11(1):22228. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-01516-8. Sci Rep. 2021. PMID: 34782672 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Allareddy V, Allareddy V, Nalliah R P. Epidemiology of facial fracture injuries. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2011;69(10):2613–2618. - PubMed
-
- Roden K S, Tong W, Surrusco M, Shockley W W, Van Aalst J A, Hultman C S. Changing characteristics of facial fractures treated at a regional, level 1 trauma center, from 2005 to 2010: an assessment of patient demographics, referral patterns, etiology of injury, anatomic location, and clinical outcomes. Ann Plast Surg. 2012;68(5):461–466. - PubMed
-
- Mulligan R P, Friedman J A, Mahabir R C. A nationwide review of the associations among cervical spine injuries, head injuries, and facial fractures. J Trauma. 2010;68(3):587–592. - PubMed
-
- Moghadam H G Urist M R Sandor G K Clokie C M Successful mandibular reconstruction using a BMP bioimplant J Craniofac Surg 2001122119–127., discussion 128 - PubMed
-
- Wang X X, Allen R J Jr, Tutela J P. et al.Progenitor cell mobilization enhances bone healing by means of improved neovascularization and osteogenesis. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2011;128(2):395–405. - PubMed
Publication types
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources