Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2015 Feb 24;13(2):e1002074.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.1002074. eCollection 2015 Feb.

Walk on the wild side: estimating the global magnitude of visits to protected areas

Affiliations

Walk on the wild side: estimating the global magnitude of visits to protected areas

Andrew Balmford et al. PLoS Biol. .

Abstract

How often do people visit the world's protected areas (PAs)? Despite PAs covering one-eighth of the land and being a major focus of nature-based recreation and tourism, we don't know. To address this, we compiled a globally-representative database of visits to PAs and built region-specific models predicting visit rates from PA size, local population size, remoteness, natural attractiveness, and national income. Applying these models to all but the very smallest of the world's terrestrial PAs suggests that together they receive roughly 8 billion (8 x 109) visits/y-of which more than 80% are in Europe and North America. Linking our region-specific visit estimates to valuation studies indicates that these visits generate approximately US $600 billion/y in direct in-country expenditure and US $250 billion/y in consumer surplus. These figures dwarf current, typically inadequate spending on conserving PAs. Thus, even without considering the many other ecosystem services that PAs provide to people, our findings underscore calls for greatly increased investment in their conservation.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Fig 1
Fig 1. Estimated total PA visit rates for each country.
Totals (which are log10-transformed) were derived by applying the relevant regional GLM (S3 Table) to all of a country’s terrestrial PAs (excluding those <10 ha, and marine and IUCN Category I PAs) listed in the WDPA [18]. Asterisks show countries for which we had visit rate observations.

References

    1. Ceballos-Lascurain H (1996) Tourism, Ecotourism and Protected Areas . Gland: IUCN; 301 p.
    1. Bateman IJ, et al. (2011) The UK National Ecosystem Assessment Technical Report. Cambridge: UK NEA and UNEP–WCMC. pp. 1067–1152.
    1. Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (2005) Ecosystems and Human Well-being: Synthesis. Washington, DC: Island Press; 155 p.
    1. Eagles PFJ, McLean D, Stabler MJ (2000) Estimating the tourism volume and value in protected areas in Canada and the USA. George Wright Forum 17: 62–76.
    1. Scholes RJ, Biggs R (2004) Ecosystem Services in Southern Africa: A Regional Assessment. Pretoria: CSIR; 84 p.

Publication types