Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2015 Dec;33(12):2159-67.
doi: 10.1007/s00345-015-1507-6. Epub 2015 Feb 25.

Epidemiology of hypospadias in Europe: a registry-based study

Affiliations

Epidemiology of hypospadias in Europe: a registry-based study

Jorieke E H Bergman et al. World J Urol. 2015 Dec.

Abstract

Background: Hypospadias is a common congenital malformation. The prevalence of hypospadias has a large geographical variation, and recent studies have reported both increasing and decreasing temporal trends. It is unclear whether hypospadias prevalence is associated with maternal age.

Aim: To analyze the prevalence and trends of total hypospadias, isolated hypospadias, hypospadias with multiple congenital anomalies, hypospadias with a known cause, and hypospadias severity subtypes in Europe over a 10-year period and to investigate whether maternal age is associated with hypospadias.

Methods: We included all children with hypospadias born from 2001 to 2010 who were registered in 23 EUROCAT registries. Information on the total number of births and maternal age distribution for the registry population was also provided. We analyzed the total prevalence of hypospadias and relative risks by maternal age.

Results: From 2001 to 2010, 10,929 hypospadias cases were registered in 5,871,855 births, yielding a total prevalence of 18.61 per 10,000 births. Prevalence varied considerably between different registries, probably due to differences in ascertainment of hypospadias cases. No significant temporal trends were observed with the exceptions of an increasing trend for anterior and posterior hypospadias and a decreasing trend for unspecified hypospadias. After adjusting for registry effects, maternal age was not significantly associated with hypospadias.

Conclusions: Total hypospadias prevalence was stable in 23 EUROCAT registries from 2001 to 2010 and was not significantly influenced by maternal age.

Keywords: Ascertainment; Congenital anomaly registers; Epidemiology; Hypospadias; Maternal age; Prevalence.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Prevalence of total hypospadias (a), isolated hypospadias, hypospadias with multiple congenital anomalies (MCA), hypospadias with known cause (b) and hypospadias subtypes (c) in 23 EUROCAT registries 2001–2010. a All hypospadias: heterogeneous in time (p value trend = 0.136, p value nonlinear change = 0.013) Multilevel Poisson regression analysis: no significant effect of birth year (p value = 0.136) Error bars show 95 % confidence interval. b Isolated hypospadias: heterogeneous in time (p value trend = 0.137, p value nonlinear change = 0.002) Hypospadias with MCA: no significant change in prevalence over time (p value trend = 0.576, p value nonlinear change = 0.930) Hypospadias with a known cause: heterogeneous in time (p value trend = 0.054, p value nonlinear change = 0.020). c Hypospadias not otherwise specified (NOS): significant decreasing trend (p value trend < 0.001, p value nonlinear change < 0.001, trend is monotonic) Anterior hypospadias: significant increasing trend (p value trend < 0.001, p value nonlinear change < 0.001, trend is monotonic) Middle hypospadias: heterogeneous in time (p value trend = 0.868, p value nonlinear change = 0.001) Posterior hypospadias: significant increasing trend (p value trend = 0.005, p value nonlinear change = 0.071)

References

    1. Hennekam RC, Allanson JE, Biesecker LG, Carey JC, Opitz JM, Vilain E. Elements of morphology: standard terminology for the external genitalia. Am J Med Genet A. 2013;161A:1238–1263. doi: 10.1002/ajmg.a.35934. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Snodgrass W, Macedo A, Hoebeke P, Mouriquand PD. Hypospadias dilemmas: a round table. J Pediatr Urol. 2011;7:145–157. doi: 10.1016/j.jpurol.2010.11.009. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Nuininga JE, de Gier RP, Verschuren R, Feitz WF. Long-term outcome of different types of 1-stage hypospadias repair. J Urol. 2005;174:1544–1548. doi: 10.1097/01.ju.0000179255.55848.50. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Shih EM, Graham JM., Jr Review of genetic and environmental factors leading to hypospadias. Eur J Med Genet. 2014;57:453–463. doi: 10.1016/j.ejmg.2014.03.003. - DOI - PubMed
    1. van der Zanden LF, van Rooij IA, Feitz WF, Franke B, Knoers NV, Roeleveld N. Aetiology of hypospadias: a systematic review of genes and environment. Hum Reprod Update. 2012;18:260–283. doi: 10.1093/humupd/dms002. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources