Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2015 Jan-Mar;9(1):11-19.
doi: 10.4103/1305-7456.149632.

A cone-beam computed tomographic study of root canal systems in mandibular premolars in a Turkish population: Theoretical model for determining orifice shape

Affiliations

A cone-beam computed tomographic study of root canal systems in mandibular premolars in a Turkish population: Theoretical model for determining orifice shape

Hakan Arslan et al. Eur J Dent. 2015 Jan-Mar.

Abstract

Objective: The purposes of this retrospective study were to represent a newly designed theoretical model for determining orifice shape and morphologic properties of mandibular premolars and to correlate these findings with each other.

Materials and methods: A total of 287 mandibular premolar images obtained from 88 patients by cone-beam computed tomography were included in this study. The measurements were performed below the cementoenamel junction, and different orifice configurations were defined in accordance with various ratios. The age and gender of the patient, the tooth type and position, the number of roots, orifice configuration, root canal configuration, presence of C-shaped canal, and the presence of radicular groove were recorded. It was also recorded whether the root canal becomes round or not and if any, length of the root canal from the orifice to the section in which it becomes round. Furthermore, the theoretical model for determining orifice shape was defined after measurements. The orifice shape was determined as round, oval, flat, keyhole-shaped, and T-shaped, and orifices with short, normal length, and long isthmus. Statistical analyses were performed using Chi-square and Spearman's rank correlation tests (P = 0.05).

Results: Orifice configurations were, usually, flat (37%), or keyhole-shaped (23%). The prevalence of T-shaped was found to be 3.8%. The prevalence of C-shaped canals was found to be 2.1%. The percentage of root canals that became round in the middle or apical thirds was 95.1%. Radicular grooves were detected in 37 (24%) of first premolars and six (4.5%) of second premolars. Statistical analysis revealed that the mean length of distance until the canal reached a round shape varied according to age group (r = -0.270; P < 0.001). There was a statistically significant difference between radicular groove and tooth type (P < 0.001).

Conclusions: The mean length of distance until the canal reached a round shape correlated with the patient's age. The new theoretical model could be beneficial to determine orifice configurations.

Keywords: Cone-beam computed tomography; Turkish; isthmus; mandibular premolars; orifice; theoretical modeling.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest: None declared

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Shows measurements. (a) R1: Buccolingual length of orifice, R2: Mesiodistal length in the middle of the orifice, d1-d2: The mesiodistal length in the buccal and lingual parts was defined as d1 (long) and d2 (short), and (b) shortest distance between the root canal and outer surface of the groove
Figure 2
Figure 2
Measurements on the cone-beam computed tomography images. (a and b) Lengths measurements at the orifice, (c and d) shortest distance between the root canal and outer surface of the groove
Figure 3
Figure 3
Theoretical model for determining orifice configuration (R1: The buccolingual length of the orifice, R2: The mesiolingual length in the middle after the orifice was divided into three parts buccolingually, d1: The long mesiodistal length in the buccal or lingual part of the orifice, d2: The short mesiodistal length in the buccal or lingual part of the orifice)

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Sachdeva GS, Ballal S, Gopikrishna V, Kandaswamy D. Endodontic management of a mandibular second premolar with four roots and four root canals with the aid of spiral computed tomography: A case report. J Endod. 2008;34:104–7. - PubMed
    1. Barbizam JV, Ribeiro RG, Tanomaru Filho M. Unusual anatomy of permanent maxillary molars. J Endod. 2004;30:668–71. - PubMed
    1. Ayranci LB, Arslan H, Topcuoglu HS. Maxillary first molar with three canal orifices in MesioBuccal root. J Conserv Dent. 2011;14:436–7. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Poorni S, Karumaran CS, Indira R. Mandibular first premolar with two roots and three canals. Aust Endod J. 2010;36:32–4. - PubMed
    1. Awawdeh LA, Al-Qudah AA. Root form and canal morphology of mandibular premolars in a Jordanian population. Int Endod J. 2008;41:240–8. - PubMed