Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2015;14(7):950-8.
doi: 10.1080/15384101.2015.1014147.

The emerging role of lysine demethylases in DNA damage response: dissecting the recruitment mode of KDM4D/JMJD2D to DNA damage sites

Affiliations

The emerging role of lysine demethylases in DNA damage response: dissecting the recruitment mode of KDM4D/JMJD2D to DNA damage sites

Hanan Khoury-Haddad et al. Cell Cycle. 2015.

Abstract

KDM4D is a lysine demethylase that removes tri- and di- methylated residues from H3K9 and is involved in transcriptional regulation and carcinogenesis. We recently showed that KDM4D is recruited to DNA damage sites in a PARP1-dependent manner and facilitates double-strand break repair in human cells. Moreover, we demonstrated that KDM4D is an RNA binding protein and mapped its RNA-binding motifs. Interestingly, KDM4D-RNA interaction is essential for its localization on chromatin and subsequently for efficient demethylation of its histone substrate H3K9me3. Here, we provide new data that shed mechanistic insights into KDM4D accumulation at DNA damage sites. We show for the first time that KDM4D binds poly(ADP-ribose) (PAR) in vitro via its C-terminal region. In addition, we demonstrate that KDM4D-RNA interaction is required for KDM4D accumulation at DNA breakage sites. Finally, we discuss the recruitment mode and the biological functions of additional lysine demethylases including KDM4B, KDM5B, JMJD1C, and LSD1 in DNA damage response.

Keywords: DNA damage response (DDR); KDM4D; PARP1; and cancer; chromosomal instability; double strand break (DSB); lysine demethylases (KDM); poly(ADP-ribose)ylation (PARylation).

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
KDM4D region spanning 350–474 amino acids binds PAR in vitro. PAR-binding assay with 6xHis tagged KDM4D full-length (FL) protein (523aa) (A), deletion mutants: N-terminal (1–350aa) (B), GST-tagged C-terminal (350–523aa) (C), truncated C-terminal (1–474aa) and internal deletion 350–474aa (D), and 6xHis tagged KDM4D-4M mutant (contains 4 mutations: E357A, R450A, R451A and R455A) (E). 6xHis-Rpn8, GST-only and BSA are used as negative controls and H3 as a positive control. Right: schematic representation of KDM4D mutants. IB: Immunoblot. 32P: radiolabelled PAR.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
KDM4D PAR-binding region is essential for its recruitment to laser-microirradiated sites. Representative cells showing the localization of EGFP-KDM4D-WT EGFP-KDM4D1-474aa and EGFP-KDM4DΔ350-474aa fusions before and 5 minutes after the induction of laser-microirradiation to a single region, marked with a white arrow. Each cell is representative of at least 20 different cells. The graph shows the increase in the relative fluorescence intensity of KDM4D fusions at laser-microirradiated sites. Error bars represent SD of 10 different cells.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
KDM4D-RNA interactions are essential for KDM4D accumulation at DNA damage sites. Representative cells showing the localization of EGFP-KDM4D-WT and EGFP-KDM4D-1H4R-HRK fusions before and 5 minutes after the induction of laser-microirradiation to a single region, marked by a white arrow. Each cell is representative of at least 20 cells. The graph shows the increase in the relative fluorescence intensity of EGFP-KDM4D-WT and EGFP-KDM4D-1H4K-HRK at laser-microirradiated sites. Error bars represent SD of 10 different cells.

Comment in

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Lindahl T. Instability and decay of the primary structure of DNA. Nature 1993; 362:709-15; PMID:8469282; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/362709a0 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Lindahl T, Barnes DE. Repair of endogenous DNA damage. Cold Spring Harbor Symp Quant Biol 2000; 65:127-33; PMID:12760027; http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/sqb.2000.65.127 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Jackson SP, Bartek J. The DNA-damage response in human biology and disease. Nature 2009; 461:1071-8; PMID:19847258; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature08467 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Lord CJ, Ashworth A. The DNA damage response and cancer therapy. Nature 2012; 481:287-94; PMID:22258607; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature10760 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Cassidy LD, Liau SS, Venkitaraman AR. Chromosome instability and carcinogenesis: insights from murine models of human pancreatic cancer associated with BRCA2 inactivation. Mol Oncol 2014; 8:161-8; PMID:24268522; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.molonc.2013.10.005 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

Substances