Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2015 May;84(5):915-20.
doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2015.02.001. Epub 2015 Feb 11.

Pelvic X-ray examinations in follow-up of hip arthroplasty or femoral osteosynthesis--dose reduction and quality criteria

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Pelvic X-ray examinations in follow-up of hip arthroplasty or femoral osteosynthesis--dose reduction and quality criteria

Jost Karsten Kloth et al. Eur J Radiol. 2015 May.

Abstract

Objective: Digital plain radiographs of the pelvis are frequently performed in follow-up examinations of patients who received total hip arthroplasty (THA) or osteosynthesis (OS). Thus, the purpose was to reduce the radiation dose and to determine objective quality control criteria to ensure accurate assessment.

Materials and methods: Institutional review board approval was obtained. In this prospective randomized study, 289 patients underwent X-ray examination of the pelvis as follow up after receiving THA or OS with standard and reduced dose. The evaluation of the plain radiographs was conducted using the following criteria: bone-implant interface, implant-implant discrimination, implant-surface character and periarticular heterotopic ossification. Two radiologists evaluated these criteria using a score ranging from 1 (definitely assessable) to 4 (not assessable). If a single criterion had been evaluated with a score of 3 or more or more than 2 criteria with 2 points, the radiograph was scored as "not assessable". The study was designed as non-inferiority-trial.

Results: Seven (2.4%) examined X-rays were scored as not assessable. There was no statistical inferiority between the examinations with standard (0.365 mSv) or reduced dose (0.211 mSv). Reduced dose only led to limitations in the evaluation of ceramic components with low clinical impact in most scenarios.

Conclusion: Plain radiography of the pelvis in patients with THA or OS can be performed with a dose reduction of about 42% without a loss of important information. The obtained quality control criteria were clinically applicable.

Keywords: Pelvic X-ray examination; Quality management; Radiation dose reduction; Radiation protection; Total hip arthroplasty.

PubMed Disclaimer

Publication types

MeSH terms