Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2015 Mar;45(2):137-56.
doi: 10.1007/s10519-015-9713-y. Epub 2015 Feb 26.

Genetics of wellbeing and its components satisfaction with life, happiness, and quality of life: a review and meta-analysis of heritability studies

Affiliations
Review

Genetics of wellbeing and its components satisfaction with life, happiness, and quality of life: a review and meta-analysis of heritability studies

Meike Bartels. Behav Genet. 2015 Mar.

Abstract

Wellbeing is a major topic of research across several disciplines, reflecting the increasing recognition of its strong value across major domains in life. Previous twin-family studies have revealed that individual differences in wellbeing are accounted for by both genetic as well as environmental factors. A systematic literature search identified 30 twin-family studies on wellbeing or a related measure such as satisfaction with life or happiness. Review of these studies showed considerable variation in heritability estimates (ranging from 0 to 64 %), which makes it difficult to draw firm conclusions regarding the genetic influences on wellbeing. For overall wellbeing twelve heritability estimates, from 10 independent studies, were meta-analyzed by computing a sample size weighted average heritability. Ten heritability estimates, derived from 9 independent samples, were used for the meta-analysis of satisfaction with life. The weighted average heritability of wellbeing, based on a sample size of 55,974 individuals, was 36 % (34-38), while the weighted average heritability for satisfaction with life was 32 % (29-35) (n = 47,750). With this result a more robust estimate of the relative influence of genetic effects on wellbeing is provided.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Scatterplot representing the association between variance in heritability estimate and sample size separated by cohort
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
a Heritability estimates and 95 % confidence intervals for the studies used in the meta-analysis of wellbeing. The bottom line (Meta-Analysis) shows the weighted heritability estimate and confidence interval. *CI’s estimated based on the other studies; **heritability estimated by author after receiving data from PI of Finnish Twin Cohort; ^ the heritability is the average heritability of the 6 Ryff’s dimensions. b Heritability estimates and 95 % confidence intervals for the studies used in the meta-analysis of satisfaction with life. The bottom line (Meta-analysis) shows the weighted heritability estimate and confidence interval. *CI’s estimated based on the other studies; **heritability estimated by author after receiving data from PI of Finnish Twin Cohort

References

    1. Allardt E (1973) About dimension of welfare: an exploratory analysis of the comparative Scandinavian survey. In: Reports RGoCSR (ed). University of Helsinki
    1. Andrews FM, McKennell AC. Measures of self-reported well-being: their affective, cognitive, and other components. Soc Indicator Res. 1980;8:127–155. doi: 10.1007/BF00286474. - DOI
    1. Archontaki D, Lewis GJ, Bates TC. Genetic influences on psychological well-being: a nationally representative twin study. J Pers. 2013;81(2):221–230. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6494.2012.00787.x. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bartels M, Boomsma DI. Born to be happy? The etiology of subjective well-being. Behav Genet. 2009;39(6):605–615. doi: 10.1007/s10519-009-9294-8. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bartels M, Savioul V, de Moor MHM, Willemsen AHM, van Beijsterveldt CEM, Hottenga JJ, de Geus EJC, Boomsma DI. Heritability and genome-wide linkage scan for subjective happiness. Twin Res Hum Genet. 2010;13(2):135–142. doi: 10.1375/twin.13.2.135. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources