Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2015 Feb;50(2):118-24.
doi: 10.1310/hpj5002-118.

Near-miss transcription errors: a comparison of reporting rates between a novel error-reporting mechanism and a current formal reporting system

David A South  1 , Jessica W Skelley  2 , Mary Dang  3 , Thomas Woolley  4
Affiliations

Near-miss transcription errors: a comparison of reporting rates between a novel error-reporting mechanism and a current formal reporting system

David A South et al. Hosp Pharm. 2015 Feb.

Abstract

Purpose: The medication use process comprises several steps. In institutions without full implementation of computerized prescriber order entry (CPOE), transcription is a critical step in this process. As focus is increasingly placed on identifying near-miss errors, this study aimed to compare near-miss transcription error (NMTE) reporting rates between an institution's formal reporting system and an NMTE reporting mechanism.

Methods: Two NMTE reporting mechanisms were assessed for 3 months. These mechanisms included the institution's formal error-reporting system and a specific transcription error queue within the institution's order imaging software. Date, patient-care unit, and type of transcription error were recorded for each order image in the transcription error queue and for each transcription error reported formally. Following data collection, reporting rates for both systems were compared.

Results: Data collection spanned 92 days and an estimated 460,000 medication orders. In total, 1,563 NMTEs were reported using the transcription error queue and 12 errors were reported via the formal reporting mechanism. Of the 1,563 errors identified via the transcription error queue, 325 (20.79%) were of an unknown type. Reporting rates (with unknown errors removed) were 0.27% and 0.0026% for the novel system and formal reporting system, respectively (P < .001).

Conclusion: Significantly more NMTEs were reported utilizing the novel system compared with the formal reporting system.

Keywords: medication safety; near miss; transcription error.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Kohn LT, Corrigan JM, Donaldson MS, eds. To Err is Human: Building a Safer Health System. Washington, DC: National Academy Press; 2000. - PubMed
    1. Aspden P, Wolcott JA, Bootman JL, Cronenwett LR, eds. Preventing Medication Errors. Washington, DC: National Academies Press; 2007.
    1. Leape LL.Reporting of adverse events. N Engl J Med. 2002;347:1633–1638. - PubMed
    1. Barach P, Small S.Reporting and preventing medical mishaps: Lessons from non-medical near miss reporting systems. BMJ. 2000;320:759–763. - PMC - PubMed
    1. ISMP survey helps define near miss and close call. ISMP Medication Safety Alert! September24, 2009. http://www.ismp.org/newsletters/acutecare/articles/20090924.asp Accessed April11, 2013.