Efficacy of tests used to monitor rheumatoid arthritis

Abstract

The relative efficacy of clinical and laboratory tests used to monitor disease activity in rheumatoid arthritis was determined by consensus analysis in a study of 21 patients treated for 6 months. Erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), which is influenced by the anaemia of chronic disease and by variation in the blood concentration of acute-phase proteins, was the most effective single test. ESR was a better guide to disease severity than measurement of plasma viscosity, serum C-reactive protein, and serum orosomucoid--tests that reflect the blood concentration of acute-phase proteins only. Clinical tests performed poorly unless combined with laboratory data in a numerical index. Consensus analysis can be used to assess the efficacy of clinical and laboratory tests and to identify redundant tests.