Prospective randomized comparison of scar appearances between cograft of acellular dermal matrix with autologous split-thickness skin and autologous split-thickness skin graft alone for full-thickness skin defects of the extremities
- PMID: 25719725
- DOI: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000001204
Prospective randomized comparison of scar appearances between cograft of acellular dermal matrix with autologous split-thickness skin and autologous split-thickness skin graft alone for full-thickness skin defects of the extremities
Abstract
Background: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the clinical outcomes of cografting of acellular dermal matrix with autologous split-thickness skin and autologous split-thickness skin graft alone for full-thickness skin defects on the extremities.
Methods: In this prospective randomized study, 19 consecutive patients with full-thickness skin defects on the extremities following trauma underwent grafting using either cograft of acellular dermal matrix with autologous split-thickness skin graft (nine patients, group A) or autologous split-thickness skin graft alone (10 patients, group B) from June of 2011 to December of 2012. The postoperative evaluations included observation of complications (including graft necrosis, graft detachment, or seroma formation) and Vancouver Scar Scale score.
Results: No statistically significant difference was found regarding complications, including graft necrosis, graft detachment, or seroma formation. At week 8, significantly lower Vancouver Scar Scale scores for vascularity, pliability, height, and total score were found in group A compared with group B. At week 12, lower scores for pliability and height and total scores were identified in group A compared with group B.
Conclusions: For cases with traumatic full-thickness skin defects on the extremities, a statistically significant better result was achieved with cograft of acellular dermal matrix with autologous split-thickness skin graft than with autologous split-thickness skin graft alone in terms of Vancouver Scar Scale score.
Clinical question/level of evidence: Therapeutic, II.
Comment in
-
Prospective Randomized Comparison of Scar Appearances between Cograft of Acellular Dermal Matrix with Autologous Split-Thickness Skin and Autologous Split-Thickness Skin Graft Alone for Full-Thickness Skin Defects of the Extremities.Plast Reconstr Surg. 2016 May;137(5):906e. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000001518. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2016. PMID: 26020704 No abstract available.
-
Reply: Prospective Randomized Comparison of Scar Appearances between Cograft of Acellular Dermal Matrix with Autologous Split-Thickness Skin and Autologous Split-Thickness Skin Graft Alone for Full-Thickness Skin Defects of the Extremities.Plast Reconstr Surg. 2016 May;137(5):906e-907e. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000001513. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2016. PMID: 26020706 No abstract available.
References
-
- Seo YK, Song KY, Kim YJ, Park JK. Wound healing effect of acellular artificial dermis containing extracellular matrix secreted by human skin fibroblasts. Artif Organs. 2007;31:509–520
-
- Wainwright DJ. Use of an acellular allograft dermal matrix (AlloDerm) in the management of full-thickness burns. Burns. 1995;21:243–248
-
- Corps BV. The effect of graft thickness, donor site and graft bed on graft shrinkage in the hooded rat. Br J Plast Surg. 1969;22:125–133
-
- Castagnoli C, Stella M, Magliacani G, Alasia ST, Richiardi P. Anomalous expression of HLA class II molecules on keratinocytes and fibroblasts in hypertrophic scars consequent to thermal injury. Clin Exp Immunol. 1990;82:350–354
-
- Sedmak DD, Orosz CG. The role of vascular endothelial cells in transplantation. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 1991;115:260–265
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Research Materials
