Assessment of Cesarean hysterotomy scar in non-pregnant women: reliability of transvaginal sonography with and without contrast enhancement
- PMID: 25720922
- DOI: 10.1002/uog.14833
Assessment of Cesarean hysterotomy scar in non-pregnant women: reliability of transvaginal sonography with and without contrast enhancement
Abstract
Objectives: To determine intra- and interobserver reliability of evaluating the appearance and measurement of Cesarean hysterotomy scars using transvaginal ultrasound (TVS), with and without saline contrast sonohysterography (SCSH), in non-pregnant women.
Methods: Fifty-six women with one previous Cesarean delivery were examined by TVS, with and without contrast enhancement, 6-9 months after the Cesarean delivery. Two observers, blinded to their own and each other's measurements, evaluated the appearance of the hysterotomy scar and measured the myometrial thickness adjacent to the scar or scar defect (MTS). If a scar defect was noted, the remaining myometrial thickness over the defect (RMT) was measured. A scar defect was defined as large if RMT was ≤ 2.2 mm on conventional TVS and ≤ 2.5 mm when SCSH was performed. Intra- and interobserver reliability of conventional TVS and SCSH were assessed.
Results: Intraobserver reliability was good, with intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) of ≥ 0.97 for measurements of MTS and RMT on conventional TVS and SCSH. Interobserver ICCs for measurements obtained on SCSH were 0.85 (95% CI, 0.76-0.91) for MTS and 0.96 (95% CI, 0.93-0.98) for RMT, compared with 0.82 (95% CI, 0.72-0.89) for MTS and 0.87 (95% CI, 0.68-0.95) for RMT measured on conventional TVS. The kappa coefficient for measurements obtained on SCSH was 0.92, compared with 0.85 for conventional TVS. Intermethod ICC was 0.86 (95% CI, 0.78-0.92) for measurement of MTS and 0.89 (95% CI, 0.78-0.95) for measurement of RMT, with a kappa coefficient of 0.57.
Conclusions: Measurement of RMT using SCSH is a reliable method for assessing Cesarean hysterotomy scars in non-pregnant women and can be used in clinical practice. Copyright © 2015 ISUOG. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
Keywords: Cesarean scar defect; intermethod agreement; interobserver agreement; intraobserver agreement; reliability; saline contrast sonohysterography; ultrasonography.
Copyright © 2015 ISUOG. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
Similar articles
-
Agreement between transvaginal ultrasound and saline contrast sonohysterography in evaluation of cesarean scar defect.J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod. 2019 Dec;48(10):827-831. doi: 10.1016/j.jogoh.2019.05.013. Epub 2019 May 8. J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod. 2019. PMID: 31077871
-
Assessment of Cesarean hysterotomy scar before pregnancy and at 11-14 weeks of gestation: a prospective cohort study.Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2017 Jul;50(1):105-109. doi: 10.1002/uog.16220. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2017. PMID: 27419374
-
Hysterotomy level at Cesarean section and occurrence of large scar defects: a randomized single-blind trial.Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2019 Apr;53(4):438-442. doi: 10.1002/uog.20184. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2019. PMID: 30484920 Clinical Trial.
-
Two-dimensional transvaginal sonography vs saline contrast sonohysterography for diagnosing endometrial polyps: systematic review and meta-analysis.Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2020 Oct;56(4):506-515. doi: 10.1002/uog.22161. Epub 2020 Sep 14. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2020. PMID: 32730635
-
Transvaginal hysterotomy: A novel approach for the treatment of cesarean scar pregnancy.Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol. 2019 Jul;58(4):460-464. doi: 10.1016/j.tjog.2019.05.005. Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol. 2019. PMID: 31307733 Review.
Cited by
-
Ultrasound cesarean scar assessment one year postpartum in relation to one- or two-layer uterine suture closure.Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2020 Jan;99(1):69-78. doi: 10.1111/aogs.13714. Epub 2019 Sep 26. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2020. PMID: 31441500 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Sonographic examination of uterine niche in non-pregnant women: a modified Delphi procedure.Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2019 Jan;53(1):107-115. doi: 10.1002/uog.19049. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2019. PMID: 29536581 Free PMC article.
-
Changes in lower uterine segment thickness during different gestational weeks in pregnant women qualified for trial of labor after cesarean section.Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2022 Jun;157(3):710-718. doi: 10.1002/ijgo.13902. Epub 2021 Sep 20. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2022. PMID: 34449908 Free PMC article.
-
Contrast Hysterosonographic Evaluation of Niche Prevalence Following a Standardized Suturing Technique for Caesarean Sections.Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd. 2024 Aug 6;84(8):737-746. doi: 10.1055/a-2341-4586. eCollection 2024 Aug. Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd. 2024. PMID: 39114379 Free PMC article.
-
Effectiveness of hysteroscopic resection of a uterine caesarean niche can be predicted: a prospective cohort study.Sci Rep. 2020 Oct 15;10(1):17424. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-74622-8. Sci Rep. 2020. PMID: 33060690 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical