Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2015 Mar;96(3 Suppl):S79-87.
doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2014.08.008.

Facilitating effects of transcranial direct current stimulation on motor imagery brain-computer interface with robotic feedback for stroke rehabilitation

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Facilitating effects of transcranial direct current stimulation on motor imagery brain-computer interface with robotic feedback for stroke rehabilitation

Kai Keng Ang et al. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2015 Mar.

Abstract

Objective: To investigate the efficacy and effects of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) on motor imagery brain-computer interface (MI-BCI) with robotic feedback for stroke rehabilitation.

Design: A sham-controlled, randomized controlled trial.

Setting: Patients recruited through a hospital stroke rehabilitation program.

Participants: Subjects (N=19) who incurred a stroke 0.8 to 4.3 years prior, with moderate to severe upper extremity functional impairment, and passed BCI screening.

Interventions: Ten sessions of 20 minutes of tDCS or sham before 1 hour of MI-BCI with robotic feedback upper limb stroke rehabilitation for 2 weeks. Each rehabilitation session comprised 8 minutes of evaluation and 1 hour of therapy.

Main outcome measures: Upper extremity Fugl-Meyer Motor Assessment (FMMA) scores measured end-intervention at week 2 and follow-up at week 4, online BCI accuracies from the evaluation part, and laterality coefficients of the electroencephalogram (EEG) from the therapy part of the 10 rehabilitation sessions.

Results: FMMA score improved in both groups at week 4, but no intergroup differences were found at any time points. Online accuracies of the evaluation part from the tDCS group were significantly higher than those from the sham group. The EEG laterality coefficients from the therapy part of the tDCS group were significantly higher than those of the sham group.

Conclusions: The results suggest a role for tDCS in facilitating motor imagery in stroke.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01897025.

Keywords: Brain-computer interfaces; Rehabilitation; Stroke.

PubMed Disclaimer

Publication types

Associated data