Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2015 May;43(5):1260-9.
doi: 10.1007/s10439-015-1283-x. Epub 2015 Feb 28.

Robotic-assisted gait training in neurological patients: who may benefit?

Affiliations
Review

Robotic-assisted gait training in neurological patients: who may benefit?

Isabella Schwartz et al. Ann Biomed Eng. 2015 May.

Abstract

Regaining one's ability to walk is of great importance for neurological patients and is a major goal of all rehabilitation programs. Gait training of severely affected patients after the neurological event is technically difficult because of their motor weakness and balance disturbances. An innovative locomotor training that incorporates high repetitions of task-oriented practice by the use of body weight-supported treadmill training (BWSTT) was developed to overcome these obstacles. To facilitate the delivery of BWSTT, a motorized robotic driven gait orthosis (robotic-assisted gait training-RAGT) was developed. Two types of robotic gait devices were developed, end-effector and exoskeleton devices. Several randomized controlled trials have been published regarding the usage of RAGT in patients after stroke, spinal cord injury (SCI), multiple sclerosis (MS) and other neurological diseases. According to these trials, the usage of RAGT in combination with conventional rehabilitation treatment has some additive beneficial effect on the ambulation abilities mainly in sub-acute stroke and sub-acute SCI patients. No difference was found between the two types of robotic gait devices. No sufficient data regarding an optimal protocol of RAGT is available, however a longer duration and a higher intensity of RAGT seem to have more beneficial effect on the final functional ambulation outcomes. Larger controlled studies are still required to determine the optimal timing and protocol design for the maximal efficacy and long-term outcome of RAGT in neurological patients.

PubMed Disclaimer

LinkOut - more resources