Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Observational Study
. 2015 Mar;3(3):201-9.
doi: 10.1016/S2213-2600(15)00036-3. Epub 2015 Feb 26.

Sputum culture conversion as a prognostic marker for end-of-treatment outcome in patients with multidrug-resistant tuberculosis: a secondary analysis of data from two observational cohort studies

Affiliations
Observational Study

Sputum culture conversion as a prognostic marker for end-of-treatment outcome in patients with multidrug-resistant tuberculosis: a secondary analysis of data from two observational cohort studies

Ekaterina V Kurbatova et al. Lancet Respir Med. 2015 Mar.

Abstract

Background: Sputum culture conversion is often used as an early microbiological endpoint in phase 2 clinical trials of tuberculosis treatment on the basis of its assumed predictive value for end-of-treatment outcome, particularly in patients with drug-susceptible tuberculosis. We aimed to assess the validity of sputum culture conversion on solid media at varying timepoints, and the time to conversion, as prognostic markers for end-of-treatment outcome in patients with multidrug-resistant (MDR) tuberculosis.

Methods: We analysed data from two large cohort studies of patients with MDR tuberculosis. We defined sputum culture conversion as two or more consecutive negative cultures from sputum samples obtained at least 30 days apart. To estimate the association of 2 month and 6 month conversion with successful treatment outcome, we calculated odds ratios (ORs) and 95% CIs with random-effects multivariable logistic regression. We calculated predictive values with bivariate random-effects generalised linear mixed modelling.

Findings: We assessed data for 1712 patients who had treatment success, treatment failure, or who died. Among patients with treatment success, median time to sputum culture conversion was significantly shorter than in those who had poor outcomes (2 months [IQR 1-3] vs 7 months [3 to ≥24]; log-rank p<0·0001). Furthermore, conversion status at 6 months (adjusted OR 14·07 [95% CI 10·05-19·71]) was significantly associated with treatment success compared with failure or death. Sputum culture conversion status at 2 months was significantly associated with treatment success only in patients who were HIV negative (adjusted OR 4·12 [95% CI 2·25-7·54]) or who had unknown HIV infection (3·59 [1·96-6·58]), but not in those who were HIV positive (0·38 [0·12-1·18]). Thus, the overall association of sputum culture conversion with a successful outcome was substantially greater at 6 months than at 2 months. 2 month conversion had low sensitivity (27·3% [95% confidence limit 16·6-41·4]) and high specificity (89·8% [82·3-94·4]) for prediction of treatment success. Conversely, 6 month sputum culture conversion status had high sensitivity (91·8% [85·9-95·4]), but moderate specificity (57·8% [42·5-71·6]). The maximum combined sensitivity and specificity for sputum culture conversion was reached between month 6 and month 10 of treatment.

Interpretation: Time to sputum culture conversion, conversion status at 6 months, and conversion status at 2 months in patients without known HIV infection can be considered as proxy markers of end-of-treatment outcome in patients with MDR tuberculosis, although the overall association with treatment success is substantially stronger for 6 month than for 2 month conversion status. Investigators should consider these results regarding the validity of sputum culture conversion at various timepoints as an early predictor of treatment efficacy when designing phase 2 studies before investing substantial resources in large, long-term, phase 3 trials of new treatments for MDR tuberculosis.

Funding: US Agency for International Development, US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Division of Intramural Research of the US National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, Korea Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of Interest

No conflict of interest reported for all contributors.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Diagram of patient population and derivation of study participants included in analysis
Note. TB=tuberculosis. MDR=multidrug-resistant. XDR=extensively drug-resistant. PETTS=Preserving Effective Tuberculosis Treatment Study. CBS=Case-based study. DST=drug-susceptibility testing. FQ=fluoroquinolone. SLI=second-line injectable drug.
Figure 2
Figure 2. Time to sputum culture conversion among MDR-TB patients by treatment outcome (success versus failure or death), N=1,712
Time to initial sputum culture conversion was truncated at 24 months.
Figure 3
Figure 3. Forest plots for empiric (crude) sensitivity and specificity of initial sputum culture conversion (SCC) in predicting treatment outcome, by country/study. N=1,712
Note. CL=confidence limits. LCL=lower confidence limit. UCL=upper confidence limit. PETTS=Preserving Effective Tuberculosis Treatment Study. CBS=Case-based study. ES=Estonia. LA=Latvia. PE=Peru. PH=Philippines. RU=Russia. SK=Republic of South Korea. SA=South Africa. TH=Thailand. TW=Taiwan.
Figure 4
Figure 4. Diagnostic performance of timing of initial sputum culture conversion in predicting treatment outcome (success versus failure or death), N=1,712
Note. Estimates of sensitivity and specificity are based on the results of bivariate generalized linear mixed model unadjusted for covariates. Numbers on the ROC curve represent month of SCC status assessment.

Comment in

References

    1. Food and Drug Administration (U.S.) [13 March 2014];FDA News Release. 2012 Dec 31;
    1. Mitchison DA. Assessment of new sterilizing drugs for treating pulmonary tuberculosis by culture at 2 months. The American review of respiratory disease. 1993 Apr;147(4):1062–1063. - PubMed
    1. Wallis RS, Doherty TM, Onyebujoh P, et al. Biomarkers for tuberculosis disease activity, cure, and relapse. Lancet Infect Dis. 2009 Mar;9(3):162–172. - PubMed
    1. Lienhardt C, Davies G. Methodological issues in the design of clinical trials for the treatment of multidrug-resistant tuberculosis: challenges and opportunities. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 2010 May;14(5):528–537. - PubMed
    1. US Food and Drug Administration. Development of Drugs to Treat Multi-Drug Resistant Tuberculosis (MDR-TB). AIDAC Advisory Committee Meeting; June 3, 2009; [March 17, 2014]. http://www.fda.gov/AdvisoryCommittees/CommitteesMeetingMaterials/Drugs/A....

Publication types