Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2015 Feb;19(1):42-8.
doi: 10.1016/j.jaapos.2014.10.022.

A randomized trial of adding a plano lens to atropine for amblyopia

Collaborators
Randomized Controlled Trial

A randomized trial of adding a plano lens to atropine for amblyopia

Pediatric Eye Disease Investigator Group et al. J AAPOS. 2015 Feb.

Abstract

Background: Some children have residual amblyopia after treatment with atropine eyedrops for amblyopia due to strabismus and/or anisometropia. We conducted a randomized clinical trial to evaluate the effectiveness of augmenting the effect of atropine by changing the lens over the fellow eye to plano in children with residual amblyopia.

Methods: A total of 73 children 3 to <8 years of age (mean, 5.8 years) with stable residual amblyopia (range, 20/32 to 20/160, mean 20/63(+1)) were enrolled after at least 12 weeks of atropine treatment of the fellow eye. Participants were randomly assigned to continuing weekend atropine alone or wearing a plano lens over the fellow eye (while continuing atropine). The primary outcome was assessed at 10 weeks, and participants were followed until improvement ceased.

Results: At the 10-week primary outcome visit, amblyopic-eye visual acuity had improved an average of 1.1 lines with the plano lens and 0.6 lines with atropine only (difference adjusted for baseline visual acuity = + 0.5 line; 95% CI, -0.1 to +1.2). At the primary outcome or later visit when the best-measured visual acuity was observed, the mean amblyopic-eye improvement from baseline was 1.9 lines with the plano lens and 0.8 lines with atropine only.

Conclusions: When amblyopic-eye visual acuity stops improving with atropine treatment, there may be a small benefit to augmenting atropine therapy with a plano lens over the fellow eye. However, the effect was not statistically significant, and the large confidence interval raises the possibility of no benefit or a benefit larger than we observed. A larger study would be necessary to get a more precise estimate of the treatment effect.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

FIG 1
FIG 1
Flowchart showing study completion within each treatment group. *One participant in the atropine only group did not complete the 10-week primary outcome examination within the analysis window (8–15 weeks after randomization) and therefore, the visual acuity examination was considered missed for the 10-week primary outcome analysis.

References

    1. Simons K. Preschool vision screening: rationale, methodology and outcome. Surv Ophthalmol. 1996;41:3–30. - PubMed
    1. Attebo K, Mitchell P, Cumming R, Smith W, Jolly N, Sparkes R. Prevalence and causes of amblyopia in an adult population. Ophthalmology. 1998;105:154–9. - PubMed
    1. Williams C, Northstone K, Howard M, Harvey I, Harrad RA, Sparrow JM. Prevalence and risk factors for common vision problems in children: data from the ALSPAC study. Br J Ophthalmol. 2008;92:959–64. - PubMed
    1. Wang JJ, Foran S, Mitchell P. Age-specific prevalence and causes of bilateral and unilateral visual impairment in older Australians: the Blue Mountains Eye Study. Clin Experiment Ophthalmol. 2000;28:268–73. - PubMed
    1. von Noorden GK, Milam JB. Penalization in the treatment of amblyopia. Am J Ophthalmol. 1979;88:511–18. - PubMed

Publication types