Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2015 Dec;18(6):2032-41.
doi: 10.1111/hex.12357. Epub 2015 Mar 1.

Supplementing factual information with patient narratives in the cancer screening context: a qualitative study of acceptability and preferences

Kirsty F Bennett  1 , Christian von Wagner  2 , Kathryn A Robb  3
Affiliations

Supplementing factual information with patient narratives in the cancer screening context: a qualitative study of acceptability and preferences

Kirsty F Bennett et al. Health Expect. 2015 Dec.

Abstract

Objective: To explore people's responses to narrative information in the context of colorectal cancer screening.

Design: Nineteen in-depth interviews were conducted with men and women (aged 45-59). Participants were given two types of colorectal screening information to read: factual and narrative. Participants gave their views on both types of information. Data were analysed using Framework Analysis.

Results: The most frequent responses to the narrative information were that they were reassuring, made colorectal screening more vivid, participants could relate to the people in the stories and they liked the range of narratives presented. Despite the narrative information being seen as more persuasive by some, this was not regarded as manipulative or negative. Both types of information were seen as equally credible. Participants felt a combination of facts and narratives would be useful when considering an offer of colorectal cancer screening.

Conclusion: Overall, participants were positive about the addition of narrative information to the currently provided factual information about colorectal cancer screening. Supplementing existing factual information with narrative information may provide participants with a more complete understanding of participation in colorectal cancer screening when considering an offer to be screened.

Keywords: bowel cancer; cancer screening; narratives; patient information; qualitative study.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Hinyard LJ, Kreuter MW. Using narrative communication as a tool for health behaviour change: a conceptual, theoretical and empirical overview. Health Education & Behaviour, 2007; 34: 777–792. - PubMed
    1. Khangura S, Bennett C, Stacey D, O'Connor AM. Personal stories in publicly available patient decision aids. Patient Education and Counseling, 2008; 73: 456–464. - PubMed
    1. Shaffer VA, Zikmund‐Fisher BJ. All stories are not alike: a purpose‐, content‐, and valence‐based taxonomy of patient narratives in decision aids. Medical Decision Making, 2013; 33: 4–13. - PubMed
    1. de Wit JBF, Das E, Vet R. What works best: objective statistics or a personal testimonial? An assessment of the persuasive effects of different types of message evidence on risk perception. Health Psychology, 2008; 27: 110–115. - PubMed
    1. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's ‘Tips from former smokers’ campaign. Available at: http://www.cdc.gov/tobacco/campaign/tips/, accessed 21 February 2015.

Publication types