Debate: should persistent incompetent truncal veins be treated immediately? The case in support of the statement
- PMID: 25729077
- DOI: 10.1177/0268355515569432
Debate: should persistent incompetent truncal veins be treated immediately? The case in support of the statement
Abstract
Background: Debate continues as to the best method of treating patients with varicose veins and which will lead to durable clinical outcomes. Many modern techniques of treating varicose veins rely on ablation of the saphenous vein alone or in combination with phlebectomy or sclerotherapy of varices. However, it has been suggested that methods which leave the saphenous trunk untreated may result in similar outcomes.
Methods: A search of medical databases was made for literature which compared the outcomes of saphenous vein stripping, sclerotherapy and modern methods of vein ablation.
Synthesis: Surgical methods which have been used range from simple phlebectomy, ligation of the saphenous trunk to stripping of the saphenous vein. Systematic comparison of striping of the saphenous vein in addition to ligation of the sapheno-femoral junction appears to improve the outcome of varicose veins surgery compared to saphenous ligation alone. The 21st century endovenous treatments for varicose veins all rely on ablating the saphenous trunk. Duplex ultrasound studies show some variation in the efficacy of saphenous ablation with these methods. However, a randomised clinical trial shows similar patient reported outcomes with all endovenous techniques and surgical stripping of the saphenous vein. A clinical series shows that after endovenous thermal ablation recurrent varices arise in residual sections of saphenous trunk, accessory veins and residual tributaries.
Conclusions: Studies based on clinical criteria require follow-up of about six years to yield reliable data. Before this time varices may be forming but cannot be detected clinically and over-optimistic results of treatment are reported. Data from surgical and endovenous treatment studies suggest that the more extensive and effective the ablation of saphenous trunks, accessory veins and tributaries, the better the long-term outcome that is achieved.
Keywords: Varicose veins; saphenous ablation; saphenous stripping; surgical treatment.
© The Author(s) 2015 Reprints and permissions: sagepub.co.uk/journalsPermissions.nav.
Similar articles
-
[Surgical techniques used for the treatment of varicose veins: survey of practice in France].J Mal Vasc. 2003 Dec;28(5):277-86. J Mal Vasc. 2003. PMID: 14978433 French.
-
Combined endovenous ablation and transilluminated powered phlebectomy: is less invasive better?Vasc Endovascular Surg. 2007 Feb-Mar;41(1):41-7. doi: 10.1177/1538574406296207. Vasc Endovascular Surg. 2007. PMID: 17277242
-
Endovenous laser ablation with and without high ligation compared to high ligation and stripping for treatment of great saphenous varicose veins: Results of a multicentre randomised controlled trial with up to 6 years follow-up.Phlebology. 2016 Feb;31(1):23-33. doi: 10.1177/0268355514555547. Epub 2014 Oct 22. Phlebology. 2016. PMID: 25342648 Clinical Trial.
-
Persistent incompetent truncal veins should not be treated immediately.Phlebology. 2015 Mar;30(1 Suppl):98-106. doi: 10.1177/0268355515569141. Phlebology. 2015. PMID: 25729076 Review.
-
Historical overview of varicose vein surgery.Ann Vasc Surg. 2010 Apr;24(3):426-32. doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2009.07.035. Epub 2010 Feb 7. Ann Vasc Surg. 2010. PMID: 20144527 Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical