The place and practices of well-being in local governance
- PMID: 25729122
- PMCID: PMC4340524
- DOI: 10.1068/c09200
The place and practices of well-being in local governance
Abstract
The concept of well-being has become prominent within national policy goals in the UK since the end of the 1990s. However, the concept of well-being remains ill defined, an instability that is increasingly understood as problematic to policy making. We engage with this terminological instability through an exploration of how the concept of well-being is practised discursively in local governance and critically examine the place of the concept in local policy making. In contrast to the current enthusiasm to define and measure well-being, we argue that the conceptual instability has inherent value for local governance. The concept of well-being is practised through a number of potentially conflicting discourses, but it is exactly this conceptual instability that enables a local negotiation and combination of alternative policy frameworks for local place-shaping strategies. As such, well-being not only is an overarching goal of governance but also contributes to the dynamics of the policy process.
References
-
- Allin P. Measuring societal wellbeing. Economic and Labour Market Review. 2007;1:46–65.
-
- Barnett N. Local government, New Labour and ‘Active Welfare’: a case of ‘self responsibilisation?”. Public Policy and Administration. 2003;18:25–38.
-
- Binkley S. Governmentality and lifestyle studies. Sociology Compass. 2007;1:111–126.
-
- Clarke M, Islam SMN, Paech S. Measuring Australia’s well-being using hierachical needs. The Journal of Socio-Economics. 2006;35:933–945.
-
- Darlington Partnership . One Darlington: perfectly placed. A vision for Darlington, 2008-2021. Darlington Borough Council; Darlington: 2008.
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Research Materials