Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2015 Mar;7(1):46-53.
doi: 10.4055/cios.2015.7.1.46. Epub 2015 Feb 10.

The result of revision total hip arthroplasty in patients with metallosis following a catastrophic failure of a polyethylene liner

Affiliations

The result of revision total hip arthroplasty in patients with metallosis following a catastrophic failure of a polyethylene liner

Hong Suk Kwak et al. Clin Orthop Surg. 2015 Mar.

Abstract

Background: Wear cannot be completely prevented after total hip arthroplasty. If severe polyethylene (PE) liner wear develops, the so-called catastrophic failure occurs and metallosis develops. We postulated that longevity of the new implant may be affected after revision surgery for metallosis following a catastrophic failure of a PE liner due to the substantial amount of PE wear particles and infiltration of the metal particles in this catastrophic condition.

Methods: Twenty-three hips of 23 patients were identified because they showed metallosis during revision total hip arthroplasties performed in Seoul National University Hospital between January 1996 and August 2004. They were followed for at least 6.5 years after the index revision total hip arthroplasty. The clinical and radiological results of revision total hip arthroplasties in these patients were evaluated.

Results: The median Harris hip score increased from 60 points before revision total hip arthroplasties to 90 points at the final follow-up. Osteolysis was detected at an average of 9.3 years after revision total hip arthroplasties in 13 hips and acetabular cup loosening at average 9.8 years after revision total hip arthroplasties in 9 hips. With radiographic evidence of osteolysis and loosening as the end points, the 15-year survival rates were 28.2% and 56.0%, respectively.

Conclusions: The survival rate of revision total hip arthroplasty in patients with metallosis following a catastrophic failure of a PE liner was low.

Keywords: Metallosis; Polyethylene wear; Revision total hip arthroplasty; Total hip arthroplasty.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

No potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Metallosis following catastrophic failure of polyethylene liner. (A) Grade III metallosis was observed around the hip joint during revision total hip arthroplasty (THA). (B) A photomicrograph of a specimen taken during revision THA shows histiocytic infiltration with abundant metallic debris (H&E, ×400).
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
(A) Catastrophic polyethylene wear and osteolysis were observed 10 years after primary total hip arthroplasty (THA). (B) Revision THA was performed using a ceramic-on-ceramic bearing. (C) There was no osteolysis or loosening 11 years after revision THA.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
(A) Catastrophic polyethylene (PE) wear and osteolysis were observed 8 years after primary total hip arthroplasty (THA). (B) Revision THA was performed using a ceramic head and a PE liner. Due to loosening of the acetabular cup (C), re-revision THA was performed 9 years after revision THA (D).
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Flowchart demonstrating the clinical and radiographic results of 13 hips with osteolysis after revision total hip arthroplasty following metallosis from catastrophic liner wear.
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
The Kaplan-Meier survival curve with osteolysis (A) and loosening (B) as the end points.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Yoon PW, Kim JI, Kim DO, et al. Cementless total hip arthroplasty for patients with Crowe type III or IV developmental dysplasia of the hip: two-stage total hip arthroplasty following skeletal traction after soft tissue release for irreducible hips. Clin Orthop Surg. 2013;5(3):167–173. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Clohisy JC, Calvert G, Tull F, McDonald D, Maloney WJ. Reasons for revision hip surgery: a retrospective review. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2004;(429):188–192. - PubMed
    1. Nam KW, Yoo JJ, Kim YL, Kim YM, Lee MH, Kim HJ. Alumina-debris-induced osteolysis in contemporary aluminaon-alumina total hip arthroplasty: a case report. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2007;89(11):2499–2503. - PubMed
    1. Park SK, Kim YG, Kim SY. Treatment of periprosthetic femoral fractures in hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Surg. 2011;3(2):101–106. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Elsner JJ, Shemesh M, Mezape Y, et al. Long-term evaluation of a compliant cushion form acetabular bearing for hip joint replacement: a 20 million cycles wear simulation. J Orthop Res. 2011;29(12):1859–1866. - PubMed

MeSH terms