Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2015 Mar;7(1):97-103.
doi: 10.4055/cios.2015.7.1.97. Epub 2015 Feb 10.

Comparison of results between hook plate fixation and ligament reconstruction for acute unstable acromioclavicular joint dislocation

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Comparison of results between hook plate fixation and ligament reconstruction for acute unstable acromioclavicular joint dislocation

Jong Pil Yoon et al. Clin Orthop Surg. 2015 Mar.

Abstract

Background: In the present study, we aimed to compare clinical and radiographic outcomes between hook plate fixation and coracoclavicular (CC) ligament reconstruction for the treatment of acute unstable acromioclavicular (AC) joint dislocation.

Methods: Forty-two patients who underwent surgery for an unstable acute dislocation of the AC joint were included. We divided them into two groups according to the treatment modality: internal fixation with a hook plate (group I, 24 cases) or CC ligament reconstruction (group II, 18 cases). We evaluated the clinical outcomes using a visual analog scale (VAS) for pain and Constant-Murley score, and assessed the radiographic outcomes based on the reduction and loss of CC distance on preoperative, postoperative, and final follow-up plain radiographs.

Results: The mean VAS scores at the final follow-up were 1.6 ± 1.5 and 1.3 ± 1.3 in groups I and II, respectively, which were not significantly different. The mean Constant-Murley scores were 90.2 ± 9.9 and 89.2 ± 3.5 in groups I and II, respectively, which were also not significantly different. The AC joints were well reduced in both groups, whereas CC distance improved from a mean of 215.7% ± 50.9% preoperatively to 106.1% ± 10.2% at the final follow-up in group I, and from 239.9% ± 59.2% preoperatively to 133.6% ± 36.7% at the final follow-up in group II. The improvement in group I was significantly superior to that in group II (p < 0.001). Furthermore, subluxation was not observed in any case in group I, but was noted in six cases (33%) in group II. Erosions of the acromion undersurface were observed in 9 cases in group I.

Conclusions: In cases of acute unstable AC joint dislocation, hook plate fixation and CC ligament reconstruction yield comparable satisfactory clinical outcomes. However, radiographic outcomes based on the maintenance of reduction indicate that hook plate fixation is a better treatment option.

Keywords: Acromioclavicular joint; Dislocation; Ligament reconstruction; Plate.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

No potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Diagnostic arthroscopy during hook plate removal, showing subacromial erosion. (A) Mild erosion was considered present when only the tip of the plate penetrated the subacromial cortex. (B) severe erosion was considered present when the entire hook penetrated the subacromial cortex.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Serial radiographs of a 25-year-old man treated with hook plate fixation, showing good maintenance of joint reduction after plate removal. (A) Preoperative. (B) Three months postoperative. (C) After plate removal.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Serial radiographs of a 49-year-old man treated with synthetic ligament reconstruction, showing good joint reduction and maintenance of joint reduction. (A) Preoperative. (B) Two months postoperative.
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Radiographs obtained 16 months postoperatively, showing mild loss of reduction and distal clavicular osteolysis after synthetic ligament reconstruction.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Oussedik S. Injuries to the clavicle and acromioclavicular joint. Br J Hosp Med (Lond) 2007;68(4):M68–M70. - PubMed
    1. Willimon SC, Gaskill TR, Millett PJ. Acromioclavicular joint injuries: anatomy, diagnosis, and treatment. Phys Sportsmed. 2011;39(1):116–122. - PubMed
    1. Ceccarelli E, Bondi R, Alviti F, Garofalo R, Miulli F, Padua R. Treatment of acute grade III acromioclavicular dislocation: a lack of evidence. J Orthop Traumatol. 2008;9(2):105–108. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Duan X, Zhang H, Zhang H, Wang Z. Treatment of coracoid process fractures associated with acromioclavicular dislocation using clavicular hook plate and coracoid screws. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2010;19(2):e22–e25. - PubMed
    1. Phillips AM, Smart C, Groom AF. Acromioclavicular dislocation: conservative or surgical therapy. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1998;(353):10–17. - PubMed

Publication types