Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2015 Mar;125(3):695-709.
doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000000647.

Persistent occiput posterior

Affiliations

Persistent occiput posterior

William H Barth Jr. Obstet Gynecol. 2015 Mar.

Abstract

Persistent occiput posterior (OP) is associated with increased rates of maternal and newborn morbidity. Its diagnosis by physical examination is challenging but is improved with bedside ultrasonography. Occiput posterior discovered in the active phase or early second stage of labor usually resolves spontaneously. When it does not, prophylactic manual rotation may decrease persistent OP and its associated complications. When delivery is indicated for arrest of descent in the setting of persistent OP, a pragmatic approach is suggested. Suspected fetal macrosomia, a biparietal diameter above the pelvic inlet or a maternal pelvis with android features should prompt cesarean delivery. Nonrotational operative vaginal delivery is appropriate when the maternal pelvis has a narrow anterior segment but ample room posteriorly, like with anthropoid features. When all other conditions are met and the fetal head arrests in an OP position in a patient with gynecoid pelvic features and ample room anteriorly, options include cesarean delivery, nonrotational operative vaginal delivery, and rotational procedures, either manual or with the use of rotational forceps. Recent literature suggests that maternal and fetal outcomes with rotational forceps are better than those reported in older series. Although not without significant challenges, a role remains for teaching and practicing selected rotational forceps operations in contemporary obstetrics.

PubMed Disclaimer

Comment in

  • Persistent Occiput Posterior.
    Grossman R. Grossman R. Obstet Gynecol. 2015 Jul;126(1):213. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000000934. Obstet Gynecol. 2015. PMID: 26241276 No abstract available.
  • Persistent Occiput Posterior.
    Lowen M. Lowen M. Obstet Gynecol. 2015 Jul;126(1):213. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000000935. Obstet Gynecol. 2015. PMID: 26241277 No abstract available.
  • In Reply.
    Barth WH Jr. Barth WH Jr. Obstet Gynecol. 2015 Jul;126(1):213-4. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000000936. Obstet Gynecol. 2015. PMID: 26241278 No abstract available.

References

    1. Yeomans ER. Operative vaginal delivery. Obstet Gynecol 2010;115:645–53.
    1. Gardberg M, Tuppurainen M. Persistent occiput posterior position—a clinical problem. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 1994;73:45–7.
    1. Gardberg M, Laakonen E, Sälevaara M. Intrapartum sonography and persistent occiput posterior position: a study of 408 deliveries. Obstet Gynecol 1998;91:746–9.
    1. Ponkey SE, Cohen AP, Heffner LJ, Lieberman E. Persistent fetal occiput posterior position: obstetric outcomes. Obstet Gynecol 2003;101:915–20.
    1. Akmal S, Tsoi E, Howard R, Osei E, Nicholaides KH. Investigation of occiput posterior delivery by ultrasonography. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2004;24:425–8.