Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2015 May-Jun;21(3):129-34.
doi: 10.1097/SPV.0000000000000158.

Do symptoms of pelvic floor disorders bias maternal recall of obstetrical events up to 10 years after delivery?

Crystal Chen  1 , LaPortia J Smith, Christopher B Pierce, Joan L Blomquist, Victoria L Handa
Affiliations

Do symptoms of pelvic floor disorders bias maternal recall of obstetrical events up to 10 years after delivery?

Crystal Chen et al. Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg. 2015 May-Jun.

Abstract

Objectives: The aim of this prospective study was to investigate whether symptoms of incontinence and prolapse bias maternal recall of obstetrical events up to 10 years after delivery.

Methods: In this secondary analysis of data gathered from the Mothers' Outcomes After Delivery study, we compared obstetrical medical records with maternal recall of delivery events. We calculated the agreement between maternal recall and the medical record across 1821 deliveries from 1011 participants for events including macrosomia, mode of delivery, prolonged second of labor, episiotomy, spontaneous laceration, anal sphincter laceration, and operative delivery. Women with symptomatic pelvic floor disorders were identified through administration of the Epidemiology of Prolapse and Incontinence Questionnaire or a clinical history of therapy for a pelvic floor disorder. We determined whether agreement between maternal recall and the medical record differed for those with or without symptoms using the medical record as a criterion standard.

Results: Agreement between maternal recall and the medical record was excellent for macrosomia and forceps deliveries (κ > 0.8), fair to good for episiotomy (κ = 0.61) and anal sphincter laceration (κ = 0.57), and poor for spontaneous perineal laceration (κ = 0.41). Symptomatic pelvic floor disorders did not impact maternal recall of macrosomia, prolonged second stage, episiotomy, spontaneous laceration, or operative delivery. However, recall of anal sphincter lacerations was biased by symptoms of pelvic floor disorders. Specifically, symptomatic women were significantly more likely to report a history of anal sphincter laceration, regardless of whether a sphincter laceration was documented (P = 0.025).

Conclusions: Maternal recall of anal sphincter laceration may be biased by symptomatic pelvic floor disorders. In research based on maternal recall of obstetrical events, this could strengthen the apparent association between sphincter laceration and pelvic floor disorders.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have declared they have no conflicts of interest.

References

    1. Biering-Sorensen U. Reporting of hospitalization in the health interview survey. Vital Health Stat 1. 1965;(61):1–71. - PubMed
    1. Madow WG. Net differences in interview data on chronic conditions and information derived from medical records. Vital Health Stat 2. 1973;(57):1–58. - PubMed
    1. Bradburn NM, Rips LJ, Shevell SK. Answering autobiographical questions: the impact of memory and inference on surveys. Science. 1987;236(4798):157–161. - PubMed
    1. Hopkins LM, Caughey AB, Brown JS, et al. Concordance of chart abstraction and patient recall of intrapartum variables up to 53 years later. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2007;196(3):233.e1–233.e6. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Hewson D, Bennett A. Childbirth research data: medical records or women’s reports? Am J Epidemiol. 1987;125(3):484–491. - PubMed

Publication types