Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2015 Feb-Mar;70(2):105-18.
doi: 10.1037/a0036834.

Decision making and cancer

Affiliations
Review

Decision making and cancer

Valerie F Reyna et al. Am Psychol. 2015 Feb-Mar.

Abstract

We review decision making along the cancer continuum in the contemporary context of informed and shared decision making in which patients are encouraged to take a more active role in their health care. We discuss challenges to achieving informed and shared decision making, including cognitive limitations and emotional factors, but argue that understanding the mechanisms of decision making offers hope for improving decision support. Theoretical approaches to decision making that explain cognition, emotion, and their interaction are described, including classical psychophysical approaches, dual-process approaches that focus on conflicts between emotion versus cognition (or reason), and modern integrative approaches such as fuzzy-trace theory. In contrast to the earlier emphasis on rote use of numerical detail, modern approaches emphasize understanding the bottom-line gist of options (which encompasses emotion and other influences on meaning) and retrieving relevant social and moral values to apply to those gist representations. Finally, research on interventions to support better decision making in clinical settings is reviewed, drawing out implications for future research on decision making and cancer.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Amsterlaw J, Zikmund-Fisher B, Fagerlin A, Ubel PA. Can avoidance of complications lead to biased healthcare decisions? Judgment and Decision Making. 2006;1(1):64.
    1. Barry MJ. Screening for prostate cancer – the controversy that refuses to die. New England Journal of Medicine. 2009;360:1351–1354. - PubMed
    1. Bartels DM, Bauman CW, Skitka LJ, Medin DL. The psychology of learning and motivation. Vol. 50. London: Academic; 2009.
    1. Bastardi A, Shafir E. On the pursuit and misuse of useless information. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 1998;75:19–32. - PubMed
    1. Beckjord EB, Finney Rutten LJ, Arora NK, Moser RP, Hesse BW. Information processing and negative affect: Evidence from the 2003 health information national trends survey. Health Psychology. 2008;27(2):249–257. doi: 10.1037/0278-6133.27.2.249. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources