Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2015 May;43(5):518-24.
doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2015.02.013. Epub 2015 Feb 27.

Baseline caries risk assessment as a predictor of caries incidence

Affiliations

Baseline caries risk assessment as a predictor of caries incidence

Benjamin W Chaffee et al. J Dent. 2015 May.

Abstract

Few studies have evaluated clinical outcomes following caries risk assessment in large datasets that reflect risk assessments performed during routine practice.

Objectives: From clinical records, compare 18-month caries incidence according to baseline caries risk designation.

Methods: For this retrospective cohort study, data were collected from electronic records of non-edentulous adult patients who completed an oral examination and caries risk assessment (CRA) at a university instructional clinic from 2007 to 2012 (N=18,004 baseline patients). The primary outcome was the number of new decayed/restored teeth from the initial CRA to the ensuing oral examination, through June 30, 2013 (N=4468 patients with follow-up). We obtained doubly-robust estimates for 18-month caries increment by baseline CRA category (low, moderate, high, extreme), adjusted for patient characteristics (age, sex, payer type, race/ethnicity, number of teeth), provider type, and calendar year.

Results: Adjusted mean decayed, restored tooth (DFT) increment from baseline to follow-up was greater with each rising category of baseline caries risk, from low (0.94), moderate (1.26), high (1.79), to extreme (3.26). The percentage of patients with any newly affected teeth (DFT increment>0) was similar among low-risk and moderate-risk patients (cumulative incidence ratio, RR: 1.01; 95% confidence interval, CI: 0.83, 1.23), but was increased relative to low-risk patients among high-risk (RR: 1.28; 95% CI: 1.10, 1.52), and extreme-risk patients (RR: 1.52; 95% CI: 1.23, 1.87).

Conclusions: These results lend evidence that baseline caries risk predicts future caries in this setting, supporting the use of caries risk assessment to identify candidate patients for more intensive preventive therapy.

Clinical significance: Identification of patients at greater risk for future caries helps clinicians to plan appropriate personalized care. In this study, a multifactorial approach to caries risk assessment effectively stratified patients into groups of higher or lower caries propensity. Dentists can apply risk assessment in practice antecedent to patient-tailored caries management.

Keywords: Caries management; Caries risk assessment; Dental caries; Epidemiology; Longitudinal studies.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest related to this research.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Participant flow diagram by inclusion criteria, caries risk assessment, and follow-up. Of all clinic patients with a completed oral examination from July 1, 2007 through December 31, 2012, the analytic sample included 18,004 eligible patients with a caries risk assessment.

Comment in

References

    1. Fontana M, Young DA, Wolff MS. Evidence-based caries, risk assessment, and treatment. Dental Clinics of North America. 2009;53:149–161. - PubMed
    1. Hallett KB. The application of caries risk assessment in minimum intervention dentistry. Australian Dental Journal. 2013;58 (Suppl 1):26–34. - PubMed
    1. Lallam C, Decup F. Minimal intervention dentistry II: part 2. Management of caries and periodontal risks in general dental practice. British Dental Journal. 2014;216:179–85. - PubMed
    1. Tellez M, Gomez J, Pretty I, Ellwood R, Ismail A. Evidence on existing caries risk assessment systems: are they predictive of future caries? Community Dentistry and Oral Epidemiology. 2013;41:67–78. - PubMed
    1. Celik EU, Gokay N, Ates M. Efficiency of caries risk assessment in young adults using Cariogram. European Journal of Dentistry. 2012;6:270–279. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types