Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2015 Apr 1;33(10):1143-50.
doi: 10.1200/JCO.2014.57.0325. Epub 2015 Mar 2.

Awareness of breast density and its impact on breast cancer detection and risk

Affiliations

Awareness of breast density and its impact on breast cancer detection and risk

Deborah J Rhodes et al. J Clin Oncol. .

Abstract

Purpose: Legislation mandating disclosure of breast density (BD) information has passed in 21 states; however, actual awareness of BD and knowledge of its impact on breast cancer detection and risk are unknown.

Methods: We conducted a national cross-sectional survey administered in English and Spanish using a probability-based sample of screening-age women, with oversampling of Connecticut, the only state with BD legislation in effect for > 1 year before the survey.

Results: Of 2,311 women surveyed, 65% responded. Overall, 58% of women had heard of BD, 49% knew that BD affects breast cancer detection, and 53% knew that BD affects cancer risk. After multivariable adjustment, increased BD awareness was associated with white non-Hispanic race/ethnicity (Hispanic v white non-Hispanic: odds ratio [OR], 0.23; P < .001), household income (OR, 1.07 per category increase; P < .001), education (OR, 1.19 per category increase; P < .001), diagnostic evaluation after a mammogram (OR, 2.64; P < .001), and postmenopausal hormone therapy (OR, 1.69; P = .002). Knowledge of the masking effect of BD was associated with higher household income (OR, 1.10; P < .001), education (OR, 1.22; P = .01), prior breast biopsy (OR, 2.16; P < .001), and residing in Connecticut (Connecticut v other states: OR, 3.82; P = .003). Connecticut residents were also more likely to have discussed their BD with a health care provider (67% v 43% for residents of other US states; P = .001).

Conclusion: Disparities in BD awareness and knowledge exist by race/ethnicity, education, and income. BD legislation seems to be effective in increasing knowledge of BD impact on breast cancer detection. These findings support continued and targeted efforts to improve BD awareness and knowledge among women eligible for screening mammography.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Authors' disclosures of potential conflicts of interest are found in the article online at www.jco.org. Author contributions are found at the end of this article.

References

    1. Breast Density and Mammography Reporting Act of 2011. 2011. Oct 5, HR 3102, 112th Congress.
    1. Are You Dense Advocacy. D.E.N.S.E. State Efforts, 2015. http://www.areyoudenseadvocacy.org/dense/
    1. Baker M. The Dense Breast Debate. http://www.cancertodaymag.org/Summer2012/Pages/the-debate-on-breast-dens....
    1. American College of Radiology. ACR Statement on Reporting Breast Density in Mammography Reports and Patient Summaries. http://www.acr.org/About-Us/Media-Center/Position-Statements/Position-St....
    1. Reynolds H. Shaky Foundations for the New Mammogram Economy. http://www.bloombergview.com/articles/2012-08-01/shaky-foundations-for-t....

Publication types

MeSH terms