Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2016 Mar;75(3):552-9.
doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2014-206914. Epub 2015 Mar 2.

Paracetamol: not as safe as we thought? A systematic literature review of observational studies

Affiliations

Paracetamol: not as safe as we thought? A systematic literature review of observational studies

Emmert Roberts et al. Ann Rheum Dis. 2016 Mar.

Abstract

Objectives: We conducted a systematic literature review to assess the adverse event (AE) profile of paracetamol.

Methods: We searched Medline and Embase from database inception to 1 May 2013. We screened for observational studies in English, which reported mortality, cardiovascular, gastrointestinal (GI) or renal AEs in the general adult population at standard analgesic doses of paracetamol. Study quality was assessed using Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation. Pooled or adjusted summary statistics were presented for each outcome.

Results: Of 1888 studies retrieved, 8 met inclusion criteria, and all were cohort studies. Comparing paracetamol use versus no use, of two studies reporting mortality one showed a dose-response and reported an increased relative rate of mortality from 0.95 (0.92 to 0.98) to 1.63 (1.58 to 1.68). Of four studies reporting cardiovascular AEs, all showed a dose-response with one reporting an increased risk ratio of all cardiovascular AEs from 1.19 (0.81 to 1.75) to 1.68 (1.10 to 2.57). One study reporting GI AEs reported a dose-response with increased relative rate of GI AEs or bleeds from 1.11 (1.04 to 1.18) to 1.49 (1.34 to 1.66). Of four studies reporting renal AEs, three reported a dose-response with one reporting an increasing OR of ≥30% decrease in estimated glomerular filtration rate from 1.40 (0.79 to 2.48) to 2.19 (1.4 to 3.43).

Discussion: Given the observational nature of the data, channelling bias may have had an important impact. However, the dose-response seen for most endpoints suggests a considerable degree of paracetamol toxicity especially at the upper end of standard analgesic doses.

Keywords: Epidemiology; Osteoarthritis; Outcomes research.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Study selection. *Included animal studies, non-biological science studies and human studies of paracetamol not reporting adverse events. †Included reviews, editorials and commentaries; types of study not in inclusion criteria; outcome measures other than those in inclusion criteria.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Mortality. The relative rate of all-cause mortality in patients taking paracetamol versus patients not taking paracetamol. The online supplementary material provides the references for the included studies.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Cardiovascular adverse events (AEs). The risk ratio of cardiovascular AEs (confirmed or probable non-fatal myocardial infarction, non-fatal stroke, fatal coronary heart disease or fatal stroke) in patients taking paracetamol versus patients not taking paracetamol. The online supplementary material provides the references for the included studies.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Gastrointestinal adverse events (GI AEs). The relative rate of upper GI AEs (gastroduodenal ulcers and complications such as upper GI haemorrhages) in patients taking paracetamol versus patients not taking paracetamol. The online supplementary material provides the references for the included studies.
Figure 5
Figure 5
OR of a decrease in estimated glomerular filtration rate of at least 30 mL/min/1.73 m2 in patients taking paracetamol versus patients not taking paracetamol. The online supplementary material provides the references for the included studies.

Comment in

  • Did the subjects and the controls have the same disease?
    Forestier RJ, Erol Forestier FB. Forestier RJ, et al. Ann Rheum Dis. 2016 Jul;75(7):e43. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2015-207692. Epub 2015 Apr 20. Ann Rheum Dis. 2016. PMID: 25897017 No abstract available.
  • Paracetamol: a probably still safe drug.
    Battaggia A, Lora Aprile P, Cricelli I, Fornasari D, Fanelli A, Cricelli C, Lapi F. Battaggia A, et al. Ann Rheum Dis. 2016 Sep;75(9):e57. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2016-209713. Epub 2016 May 10. Ann Rheum Dis. 2016. PMID: 27165178 No abstract available.
  • COVID-19: thoughts at sunrise.
    Gasbarrini G. Gasbarrini G. Intern Emerg Med. 2020 Nov;15(8):1579-1580. doi: 10.1007/s11739-020-02344-w. Epub 2020 May 9. Intern Emerg Med. 2020. PMID: 32388835 Free PMC article. No abstract available.

References

    1. Blieden M, Paramore LC, Shah D, et al. . A perspective on the epidemiology of acetaminophen exposure and toxicity in the United States. Expert Rev Clin Pharmacol 2014;3:341–8. 10.1586/17512433.2014.904744 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Jordan KM, Arden NK, Doherty M, et al. . EULAR Recommendations 2003: an evidence based approach to the management of knee osteoarthritis: Report of a Task Force of the Standing Committee for International Clinical Studies Including Therapeutic Trials (ESCISIT). Ann Rheum Dis. 2003;62:1145–55. 10.1136/ard.2003.011742 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Hinz B, Brune K. Paracetamol and cyclooxygenase inhibition: is there a cause for concern? Ann Rheum Dis 2012;71:20–5. 10.1136/ard.2011.200087 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Zhang W, Nuki G, Moskowitz RW, et al. . OARSI recommendations for the management of hip and knee osteoarthritis: part III: Changes in evidence following systematic cumulative update of research published through January 2009. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 2010;18:476–99. 10.1016/j.joca.2010.01.013 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Stroup DF, Berlin JA, Morton SC, et al. . Meta-analysis of observational studies in epidemiology. JAMA 2000;283:2008–12. 10.1001/jama.283.15.2008 - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms