Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2015 Mar 3;10(8):1261-1268.
doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2015.01.057. Epub 2015 Feb 26.

A small-molecule screen for enhanced homing of systemically infused cells

Affiliations

A small-molecule screen for enhanced homing of systemically infused cells

Oren Levy et al. Cell Rep. .

Abstract

Poor homing of systemically infused cells to disease sites may limit the success of exogenous cell-based therapy. In this study, we screened 9,000 signal-transduction modulators to identify hits that increase mesenchymal stromal cell (MSC) surface expression of homing ligands that bind to intercellular adhesion molecule 1 (ICAM-1), such as CD11a. Pretreatment of MSCs with Ro-31-8425, an identified hit from this screen, increased MSC firm adhesion to an ICAM-1-coated substrate in vitro and enabled targeted delivery of systemically administered MSCs to inflamed sites in vivo in a CD11a- (and other ICAM-1-binding domains)-dependent manner. This resulted in a heightened anti-inflammatory response. This represents a new strategy for engineering cell homing to enhance therapeutic efficacy and validates CD11a and ICAM-1 as potential targets. Altogether, this multi-step screening process may significantly improve clinical outcomes of cell-based therapies.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. A medium throughput screen identified Ro-31-8425, a kinase inhibitor which upregulates CD11a expression on MSC surface
(a) Native MSCs lack surface expression of CD11a. Cells (HL-60 or MSCs) were incubated with PE-CY5-CD11a Ab and analyzed by flow cytometry (representative data from n=3 independent experiments). (b) Global screening data obtained from the medium-throughput screening to identify compounds that up-regulate CD11a expression on the MSC surface (9000 cpds in 112 384-well assay plates were screened. Green bars: S/B=signal/background ratio, Blue curve: Z’ values. Also see Experimental Procedures). (c) A dose-dependent increase in the percentage of CD11a+ MSCs in response to Ro-31-8425 pretreatment. MSCs were pretreated with DMSO vehicle control (0.1%) or Ro-31-8425 (0.1, 1, 3 and 10μM) for 24h and CD11a expression levels were assessed by CyTOF analysis (n=3. Blue dots - CD11a+ MSCs, black dots - CD11a MSCs. * = p < 0.05 vs. DMSO-treated control MSCs, Tukey's HSD test). (d) CD11a mRNA levels in response to Ro-31-8425 pretreatment as analyzed by RT-PCR. MSCs were pretreated with Ro-31-8425 (3μM) and CD11a mRNA levels were analyzed at indicated times post pretreatment (n=3. * = p < 0.05 vs. DMSO-treated control MSCs, Tukey's HSD test).
Figure 2
Figure 2. Upregulation of CD11a, in response to pretreatment with Ro-31-8425, increases MSC firm adhesion to an ICAM-1-coated surface in-vitro
(ai) MSCs firm adhesion to an ICAM-1-coated surface following pretreatment with ruboxistaurin (Rubox) or Ro-31-8425 (3μM for 24h, 10X magnification). (aii) Quantification of MSC firm adhesion to an ICAM-1 surface in response to pretreatment with ruboxistaurin and Ro-31-8425. Error bars represent standard deviation (n=3. Statistically significant difference vs. vehicle-treated control is denoted by * = p < 0.05, Tukey's HSD test). (aiii) A pie chart of the percent distribution of MSC population that express active ICAM-1 binding domains following Ro-31-8425 pretreatment (b) Ab blocking experiments demonstrate a significant involvement of CD11a in the increased firm adhesion of Ro-31-8425-treated MSCs to ICAM-1 surface. Error bars represent standard deviation (n=3. Statistically significant difference vs. no Ab control and vs. CD90 Ab control is denoted by * = p < 0.05, Tukey's HSD test).
Figure 3
Figure 3. Ro-31-8425-pretreated MSCs exhibit increased homing to inflamed sites and an improved anti-inflammatory impact following systemic administration
(a) Homing of systemically infused MSCs to LPS-induced inflamed mouse ears was assessed 24hr following cell infusion. An example 2D projection of a 3D image stack (scale bar = 50 μm) demonstrates homing to the inflamed ear of Ro-31-8425-pre-treated MSCs (green cells) compared to vehicle-treated MSCs (blue cells). MSCs are found in the vascularized region of the skin (left side of image), with the skin surface exhibiting autofluorescence in multiple channels and a characteristic tiled pattern (right side of image). Ro-31-8425 pretreatment significantly promoted MSC homing versus the vehicle-treated control cells (** = p < 0.01, Tukey's HSD test, n=8 mice). (b) For Ab blocking experiments, Ro-31-8425 or vehicle-pretreated MSCs were washed and incubated for 30 min with mouse anti-human CD11a (clone TS1/22) or Mouse IgG1 isotype control prior to staining with the Vybrant dyes and retro-orbital infusion as described above. Ab blocking experiments demonstrate involvement of CD11a and other ICAM-1 binding domains in the increased homing response of systemically infused Ro-31-8425-treated MSCs to the inflamed ear. CD11a-blocked or Ab isotype control-incubated Ro-31-8425-pretreted MSCs were co-injected systemically with vehicle MSCs (1:1 ratio) and the homing response to inflamed ear was assessed via intravital microscopy. Error bars represent standard deviation (statistically significant difference vs. Ab isotype control is denoted by * = p < 0.05, Tukey's HSD test, n=5 mice per group). (c) Ro-31-8425 -treated MSCs displayed a superior effect in reducing swollen ear thickness of the inflamed ear compared to native MSCs (* = p < 0.05, ** = p < 0.01, Tukey's HSD test, n=8 mice). (d) MSCs treated with Ro-31-8425 significantly reduced the TNF-α level in the inflamed ear compared to the control ear (** = p <0.01, Tukey's HSD test, n = 6 mice).

References

    1. Ankrum J, Karp JM. Mesenchymal stem cell therapy: Two steps forward, one step back. Trends in molecular medicine. 2010;16:203–209. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ankrum JA, Ong JF, Karp JM. Mesenchymal stem cells: immune evasive, not immune privileged. Nature biotechnology. 2014;32:252–260. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bernardo ME, Ball LM, Cometa AM, Roelofs H, Zecca M, Avanzini MA, Bertaina A, Vinti L, Lankester A, Maccario R, et al. Co-infusion of ex vivo-expanded, parental MSCs prevents life-threatening acute GVHD, but does not reduce the risk of graft failure in pediatric patients undergoing allogeneic umbilical cord blood transplantation. Bone marrow transplantation. 2011;46:200–207. - PubMed
    1. Bhatia SK, King MR, Hammer DA. The state diagram for cell adhesion mediated by two receptors. Biophysical journal. 2003;84:2671–2690. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Brehmer D, Godl K, Zech B, Wissing J, Daub H. Proteome-wide identification of cellular targets affected by bisindolylmaleimide-type protein kinase C inhibitors. Molecular & cellular proteomics : MCP. 2004;3:490–500. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms