Glial and neuronal markers in cerebrospinal fluid predict progression in multiple sclerosis
- PMID: 25732842
- PMCID: PMC4390605
- DOI: 10.1177/1352458514549397
Glial and neuronal markers in cerebrospinal fluid predict progression in multiple sclerosis
Abstract
Objective: To investigate glial and neuronal biomarkers in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) samples from patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS) and clinically isolated syndrome (CIS) suggestive of multiple sclerosis (MS), and to evaluate their ability to predict conversion from CIS to clinically definite MS (CDMS) and also disability progression in MS.
Methods: CSF levels of neurofilament light protein (NFL), t-tau, p-tau, glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP), S-100B, human chitinase 3-like 1 protein (YKL-40), monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 (MCP-1), α-sAPP and β-sAPP; and Aβ38, Aβ40 and Aβ42, were analyzed in 109 CIS patients and 192 RRMS patients. The mean follow-up time of these 301 patients was 11.7 ± 6.4 years.
Results: High levels of NFL were associated with early conversion from CIS to CDMS (hazard ratio (HR) with 95% confidence interval (CI): 2.69 (1.75 - 4.15); p < 0.0001). High levels of YKL-40 and GFAP were associated with earlier progression in the Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS), score 3: YKL-40 (HR (95% CI): 2.78 (1.48 - 5.23); p = 0.001) and GFAP (HR (95% CI): 1.83 (1.01 - 3.35); p = 0.04). High levels of YKL-40 were associated with earlier progression to EDSS 6 (HR (95% CI): 4.57 (1.01 - 20.83); p = 0.05).
Conclusions: CSF levels of NFL in CIS patients are an independent prognostic marker for conversion to CDMS. Whereas, CSF levels of YKL-40 and GFAP are independent prognostic markers for disability progression in MS.
Keywords: Biomarkers; cerebrospinal fluid; chitinase 3-like 1 protein; diagnostics; disability progression; glial fibrillary acidic protein; multiple sclerosis; neurofilament light protein; prognostic markers.
© The Author(s), 2015.
Conflict of interest statement
Laura Bau received research support, funding for travel and congress expenses from Biogen Idec, Teva, Sanofi-Aventis, Merck Serono, Novartis and Bayer Schering pharmaceuticals.
Elisabet Matas received research support, funding for travel and congress expenses from Biogen Idec, Teva, Sanofi-Aventis, Merck Serono, Novartis and Bayer Schering pharmaceuticals.
Alvaro Cobo Calvo received research support, funding for travel and congress expenses from Biogen Idec, Teva, Sanofi-Aventis, Merck Serono, Novartis and Bayer Schering pharmaceuticals.
Kaj Blennow has served on the advisory board for Innogenetics of Belgium.
Lucia Romero-Pinel received research support, funding for travel and congress expenses from Biogen Idec, Teva, Sanofi-Aventis, Merck Serono, Novartis and Bayer Schering pharmaceuticals.
Sergio Martínez-Yélamos received honoraria compensation to participate in advisory boards, collaborations as a consultant and scientific communications from Biogen Idec, Teva, Sanofi-Aventis, Merck Serono, Novartis and Bayer Schering pharmaceuticals; and received research support, funding for travel and congress expenses from Biogen Idec, Teva, Sanofi-Aventis, Merck Serono, Novartis and Bayer Schering pharmaceuticals.
Ulf Andreasson, Bob Olsson and Henrik Zetterberg report no disclosures.
Figures



References
-
- Barkhof F, Calabresi PA, Miller DH, et al. Imaging outcomes for neuroprotection and repair in multiple sclerosis trials. Nat Rev Neurol 2009; 5: 256–266. - PubMed
-
- Eng LF, Ghirnikar RS. GFAP and astrogliosis. Brain Pathol 1994; 4: 229–237. - PubMed
-
- Trapp BD, Peterson J, Ransohoff RM, et al. Axonal transection in the lesions of multiple sclerosis. N Engl J Med 1998; 338: 278–285. - PubMed
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Research Materials
Miscellaneous