Two-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion using self-locking stand-alone polyetheretherketone cages with two anchoring clips placed in the upper and lower vertebrae, respectively
- PMID: 25733346
- DOI: 10.1007/s00590-015-1613-6
Two-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion using self-locking stand-alone polyetheretherketone cages with two anchoring clips placed in the upper and lower vertebrae, respectively
Abstract
Background: Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) is a widely accepted surgical procedure for the treatment of cervical degenerative disk diseases (CDDD). The purpose of our study was to investigate the reliability and efficacy of ACDF using self-locking stand-alone polyetheretherketone (PEEK) cages, with two anchoring clips placed in the upper and lower vertebrae, respectively.
Methods and materials: Twenty-six patients who underwent ACDF using a stand-alone PEEK cage packed with local osteophytes and cancellous allograft bone from January 2010 to January 2012 were enrolled in this study. Clinical findings were assessed using a visual analog scale (VAS), Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) score, neck disability index (NDI), and Odom criteria. Intervertebral height and cervical fusion status were assessed on X-ray.
Results: Twenty-six patients underwent ACDF using a stand-alone PEEK cervical cage. All patients had a minimum 2 years of follow-up. The operative levels were C3/4, C4/5 in seven patients, C4/5, C5/6 in 13 patients, and C4/5, C6/7 in six patients. At 3 days, 6 months, and 2 years of follow-ups, the JOA scores were 10.41 ± 1.67, 13.78 ± 1.91, 14.42 ± 2.09, respectively, which was significantly higher (p < 0.01) than preoperative (7.34 ± 1.71), whereas VAS overall pain score was 4.35 ± 1.32, 1.73 ± 0.44, 1.32 ± 0.57, respectively, which was significantly lower (p < 0.01) than preoperative (8.01 ± 1.16). The NDI preoperatively was 33.94 ± 11.75, 23.53 ± 10.92 at 3 days postoperatively, 12.64 ± 8.36 at 6 months, and 10.74 ± 7.92 at 2 years of follow-ups. Intervertebral height was 5.99 ± 0.31 mm preoperatively, 8.70 ± 0.23 mm at 3 days, 8.34 ± 0.61 mm at 6 months, and 8.22 ± 0.35 mm at 2 years of follow-ups. According to Odom criteria, 10 patients (38.4%) presented with an excellent clinical outcome, 15 good (57.6%), 1 fair (3.8%), and no patient presented a poor outcome. Solid fusion was achieved in all patients (100%) at a mean time of 4.5 months.
Conclusion: ACDF using a self-locking stand-alone PEEK cage with two anchoring clips placed in the upper and lower vertebrae, respectively, could be considered a safe and effective substitute for fusion in patients with two-level CDDD; it can effectively restore the intervertebral height, facilitate radiologic follow-up, cause few complications, and lead to satisfactory outcomes.
Similar articles
-
Skip-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion with self-locking stand-alone PEEK cages for the treatment of 2 noncontiguous levels of cervical spondylosis.J Spinal Disord Tech. 2013 Oct;26(7):E286-92. doi: 10.1097/BSD.0b013e31828679b3. J Spinal Disord Tech. 2013. PMID: 23381180
-
A comparison of anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) using self-locking stand-alone polyetheretherketone (PEEK) cage with ACDF using cage and plate in the treatment of three-level cervical degenerative spondylopathy: a retrospective study with 2-year follow-up.Eur Spine J. 2016 Jul;25(7):2255-62. doi: 10.1007/s00586-016-4391-x. Epub 2016 Feb 23. Eur Spine J. 2016. PMID: 26906171
-
Three-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion with self-locking stand-alone polyetheretherketone cages.J Clin Neurosci. 2011 Nov;18(11):1505-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jocn.2011.02.045. Epub 2011 Sep 15. J Clin Neurosci. 2011. PMID: 21924914
-
Comparison of Clinical and Radiologic Outcomes Between Self-Locking Stand-Alone Cage and Cage with Anterior Plate for Multilevel Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion: A Meta-Analysis.World Neurosurg. 2019 May;125:e117-e131. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2018.12.218. Epub 2019 Jan 21. World Neurosurg. 2019. PMID: 30677575
-
Clinical outcomes of locking stand-alone cage versus anterior plate construct in two-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Eur Spine J. 2019 Jan;28(1):199-208. doi: 10.1007/s00586-018-5811-x. Epub 2018 Nov 2. Eur Spine J. 2019. PMID: 30390163
Cited by
-
Zero-Profile Anchored Spacer (ROI-C) in the Treatment of Cervical Adjacent Segment Disease.Asian J Neurosurg. 2022 Aug 25;17(2):209-217. doi: 10.1055/s-0042-1750837. eCollection 2022 Jun. Asian J Neurosurg. 2022. PMID: 36120612 Free PMC article.
-
Evaluation of bony fusion after anterior cervical discectomy: a systematic literature review.Eur Spine J. 2019 Feb;28(2):386-399. doi: 10.1007/s00586-018-5820-9. Epub 2018 Nov 17. Eur Spine J. 2019. PMID: 30448985
-
Validation of a novel blinding method for measuring postoperative knee articular cartilage using magnetic resonance imaging.MAGMA. 2019 Dec;32(6):693-702. doi: 10.1007/s10334-019-00766-y. Epub 2019 Jul 12. MAGMA. 2019. PMID: 31300932
-
Evaluation of bony fusion after anterior cervical discectomy: a systematic literature review and meta-analysis.Neurosurg Rev. 2025 Apr 25;48(1):386. doi: 10.1007/s10143-025-03542-w. Neurosurg Rev. 2025. PMID: 40274684 Free PMC article.
-
Comparison of the clinical effects of zero-profile anchored spacer (ROI-C) and conventional cage-plate construct for the treatment of noncontiguous bilevel of cervical degenerative disc disease (CDDD): A minimum 2-year follow-up.Medicine (Baltimore). 2018 Feb;97(5):e9808. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000009808. Medicine (Baltimore). 2018. PMID: 29384883 Free PMC article.
References
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Research Materials
Miscellaneous