Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2015 Oct;50(10):1527-36.
doi: 10.1007/s00127-015-1037-y. Epub 2015 Mar 4.

Customising informed consent procedures for people with schizophrenia in India

Affiliations

Customising informed consent procedures for people with schizophrenia in India

Sudipto Chatterjee et al. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2015 Oct.

Abstract

Background: There is little information on how the ethical and procedural challenges involved in the informed participation of people with schizophrenia in clinical trials are addressed in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). The informed consent procedure used in the collaborative community care for people with schizophrenia in India (COPSI) RCT was developed keeping these challenges in mind. We describe the feasibility of conducting the procedure from the trial, researcher and participants perspectives and describe the reasons for people consenting to participate in the trial or refusing to do so.

Methods: Three sources of information were used to describe the feasibility of the COPSI consent procedure: key process indicators for the trial perspective, data from a specially designed post-interview form for participant's observations and focus group discussion (FGD) with the research interviewers. Categorical data were analysed by calculating frequencies and proportions, while the qualitative data from the FGD, and the reasons for participation or refusal were analysed using a thematic content analysis approach.

Findings: 434 people with schizophrenia and their primary caregiver(s) were approached for participation in the trial. Consent interviews were conducted with 332, of whom 303 (91%) agreed to participate in the trial. Expectation of improvement was the most common reason for agreeing to participate in the trial, while concerns related to the potential disclosure of the illness, especially for women, were an important reason for refusing consent.

Conclusions: The COPSI consent procedure demonstrates preliminary, observational information about the feasibility of customising informed consent procedures for people with schizophrenia LMIC contexts. This and other similar innovations need to be refined and rigorously tested to develop evidence-based guidelines for informed consent procedures in such settings.

Keywords: COPSI trial; Capacity for consent; India; Informed consent procedure; Schizophrenia.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Lancet. 2012 Feb 4;379(9814):397-8 - PubMed
    1. Psychol Med. 1998 Sep;28(5):1113-7 - PubMed
    1. Contemp Clin Trials. 2009 Sep;30(5):427-30 - PubMed
    1. Indian J Psychiatry. 2009 Jan;51(1):34-7 - PubMed
    1. J Health Care Law Policy. 1998;1(1):66-87 - PubMed

Publication types

Associated data

LinkOut - more resources