Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2015 Jul:54:1-13.
doi: 10.1016/j.jsat.2015.02.001. Epub 2015 Feb 18.

A comparison of three interventions for homeless youth evidencing substance use disorders: results of a randomized clinical trial

Natasha Slesnick  1 , Xiamei Guo  2 , Brittany Brakenhoff  2 , Denitza Bantchevska  2
Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

A comparison of three interventions for homeless youth evidencing substance use disorders: results of a randomized clinical trial

Natasha Slesnick et al. J Subst Abuse Treat. 2015 Jul.

Abstract

While research on homeless adolescents and young adults evidencing substance use disorder is increasing, there is a dearth of information regarding effective interventions, and more research is needed to guide those who serve this population. The current study builds upon prior research showing promising findings of the community reinforcement approach (CRA) (Slesnick, Prestopnik, Meyers, & Glassman, 2007). Homeless adolescents and young adults between the ages of 14 to 20 years were randomized to one of three theoretically distinct interventions: (1) CRA (n = 93), (2) motivational enhancement therapy (MET, n = 86), or (3) case management (CM, n = 91). The relative effectiveness of these interventions was evaluated at 3, 6, and 12 months post-baseline. Findings indicated that substance use and associated problems were significantly reduced in all three interventions across time. Several moderating effects were found, especially for sex and history of childhood abuse. Findings show little evidence of superiority or inferiority of the three interventions and suggest that drop-in centers have choices for addressing the range of problems that these adolescents and young adults face.

Keywords: Homeless adolescents and young adults; Substance use disorders; Treatment outcomes.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
The CONSORT Flowchart
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Achenbach T. Integrative guide for the 1991 CBCL/4-18, YSR, and TRF profiles. Department of Psychiatry, University of Vermont; Burlington: 1991.
    1. Altena A, Brilleslijper-Kater S, Wolf J. Effective interventions for homeless youth: A systematic review. American Journal of Preventive Medicine. 2010;38(6):637–645. - PubMed
    1. American Psychiatric Association . Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders-IV-TR. 4th American Psychiatric Association; Washington, DC: 2000.
    1. Auerswald C, Eyre S. Youth homelessness in San Francisco: A life cycle approach. Social Science & Medicine. 2002;54(10):1497–1512. - PubMed
    1. Azrin NH, Donohue B, Teichner GA, Crum T, Howell J, DeCato LA. A controlled evaluation and description of individual-cognitive problem solving and family-behavior therapies in dually-diagnosed conduct-disordered and substance-dependent youth. Journal of Child & Adolescent Substance Abuse. 2001;11(1):1–43.

Publication types