Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2014 Sep 1;4(9):806-810.
doi: 10.1038/nclimate2318.

Increasing forest disturbances in Europe and their impact on carbon storage

Affiliations

Increasing forest disturbances in Europe and their impact on carbon storage

Rupert Seidl et al. Nat Clim Chang. .

Abstract

Disturbances from wind, bark beetles, and wildfires have increased in Europe's forests throughout the 20th century 1. Climatic changes were identified as a main driver behind this increase 2, yet how the expected continuation of climate change will affect Europe's forest disturbance regime remains unresolved. Increasing disturbances could strongly impact the forest carbon budget 3,4, and are hypothesized to contribute to the recently observed carbon sink saturation in Europe's forests 5. Here we show that forest disturbance damage in Europe has continued to increase in the first decade of the 21st century. Based on an ensemble of climate change scenarios we find that damage from wind, bark beetles, and forest fires is likely to increase further in coming decades, and estimate the rate of increase to +0.91·106 m3 of timber per year until 2030. We show that this intensification can offset the effect of management strategies aiming to increase the forest carbon sink, and calculate the disturbance-related reduction of the carbon storage potential in Europe's forests to be 503.4 Tg C in 2021-2030. Our results highlight the considerable carbon cycle feedbacks of changing disturbance regimes, and underline that future forest policy and management will require a stronger focus on disturbance risk and resilience.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Forest disturbance damage in Europe 1971 – 2030
Values are disturbance damage in Millions of cubic meters of timber per year – please note the different scales on the individual panels. Predictions (lighter hues) assume a continuation of business-as-usual forest management (reference strategy) and represent the median over an ensemble of scenarios of future climate and forest growth. Missing agents – such as bark beetles in the Northern and Atlantic ecoregions – indicate that they were not modeled in these particular ecoregions due to a lack of historical data and/ or relevance of the agent in these areas (see Supplementary Table 5).
Figure 2
Figure 2. Annual disturbance percentage (relative to growing stock) in Europe’s forest ecosystems
Predictions beyond 2010 assume a continuation of business-as-usual forest management (reference strategy). The median, interquartile range (dark grey), and minimum – maximum range (light grey) over an ensemble of scenarios of future climate and tree growth is indicated. Please note that the y-axis is logarithmically scaled.

References

    1. Schelhaas M-J, Nabuurs G, Schuck A. Natural disturbances in the European forests in the 19th and 20th centuries. Glob. Chang. Biol. 2003;9:1620–1633.
    1. Seidl R, Schelhaas M-J, Lexer MJ. Unraveling the drivers of intensifying forest disturbance regimes in Europe. Glob. Chang. Biol. 2011;17:2842–2852.
    1. Kurz WA, et al. Mountain pine beetle and forest carbon feedback to climate change. Nature. 2008;452:987–990. - PubMed
    1. Le Page Y, et al. Sensitivity of climate mitigation strategies to natural disturbances. Environ. Res. Lett. 2013;8:015018.
    1. Nabuurs G-J, et al. First signs of carbon sink saturation in European forest biomass. Nat. Clim. Chang. 2013;3:792–796.