Medical publishing triage - chronicling predatory open access publishers
- PMID: 25737780
- PMCID: PMC4326692
- DOI: 10.1016/S2049-0801(13)70035-9
Medical publishing triage - chronicling predatory open access publishers
Abstract
This editorial examines the problem of predatory publishers and how they have negatively affected scholarly communication. Society relies on high-quality, peer-reviewed articles for public policy, legal cases, and improving the public health. Researchers need to be aware of how predatory publishers operate and need to avoid falling into their traps. The editorial examines the recent history of predatory publishers and how they have become prominent in the world of scholarly journals.
Keywords: Open access; Predatory publishers; Scholarly journals; Scholarly publishing.
Comment in
-
Predatory journals in anaesthesiology and critical care: what to know and how to avoid pitfalls!Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2022 Apr 1;39(4):299-301. doi: 10.1097/EJA.0000000000001651. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2022. PMID: 34930887 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
References
-
- Beall, J. (2013 April 2). Article acceptance letter reveals a bogus peer review [Blog post]. Retrieved from: http://scholarlyoa.com/2013/04/02/bogus-peer-review/. in press.
-
- Doty, R.C. (2013). Tenure-track science faculty and the ‘Open Access Citation Effect.’ Journal of Librarianship and Scholarly Communication1(3):eP1052. http://dx.doi.org/10.7710/2162-3309.1052. - DOI
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources