Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2015 Mar 4;2015(3):CD010987.
doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010987.pub2.

Optical reading aids for children and young people with low vision

Lucy Barker  1 , Rachel Thomas, Gary Rubin, Annegret Dahlmann-Noor
Affiliations

Optical reading aids for children and young people with low vision

Lucy Barker et al. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. .

Abstract

Background: Low vision in childhood is a significant barrier to learning and development, particularly for reading and education. Optical low vision aids may be used to maximise the child's functional vision. The World Health Organization (WHO) has previously highlighted the importance of the use of low vision aids in managing children with visual impairment across the world.

Objectives: To assess the effect of optical low vision aids on reading in children and young people with low vision.

Search methods: We searched CENTRAL (which contains the Cochrane Eyes and Vision Group Trials Register) (2014, Issue 12), Ovid MEDLINE, Ovid MEDLINE In-Process and Other Non-Indexed Citations, Ovid MEDLINE Daily, Ovid OLDMEDLINE (January 1946 to January 2015), EMBASE (January 1980 to January 2015), the Health Technology Assessment Programme (HTA) (www.hta.ac.uk/), the ISRCTN registry (www.isrctn.com/editAdvancedSearch), ClinicalTrials.gov (www.clinicaltrials.gov) and the World Health Organization (WHO) International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (ICTRP) (www.who.int/ictrp/search/en). We did not use any date or language restrictions in the electronic searches for trials. We last searched the electronic databases on 8 January 2015.We also used manual searching to check the references listed in retrieved articles. Manufacturers of low vision aids were contacted to request any information about studies or research regarding their products.

Selection criteria: We planned to include randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and quasi-RCTs where any optical low vision aid was compared to standard refractive correction in children and young people aged between 5 and 16 years of age with low vision as defined by the WHO. We planned to include within-person design studies where the order of presentation of devices was randomised.

Data collection and analysis: Two authors independently reviewed the search results for eligibility .

Main results: No studies met the inclusion criteria for this review.

Authors' conclusions: There is a lack of good quality evidence regarding the use of optical low vision aids in children and young people. As such, no implications for practice can be drawn. We believe future research should include functional outcome measures such as reading speed, accuracy and comprehension, as well as the effect of low vision aids on quality of life, in order to truly assess and compare the effect of these devices on a child's life and development.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Lucy Barker: No commercial or proprietary interests to declare. Rachel Thomas: No commercial or proprietary interests to declare. Gary Rubin: No commercial or proprietary interests to declare. Annagret Dahlmann‐Noor: No commercial or proprietary interests to declare.

Figures

1
1
Results of searching for studies for inclusion in the review
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Update of

  • doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010987

References

References to studies excluded from this review

Greene 1993 {published data only}
    1. Greene HA, Pekar J, Brilliant R, Freeman PB, Lewis HT, Siwoff R, et al. Use of spectacle mounted telescope systems by the visually impaired. Journal of the American Optometric Association 1993;64(7):507‐13. - PubMed
Huurneman 2013 {published data only}
    1. Huurneman B, Boonstra FN, Verezen CA, Cillessen AH, Rens G, Cox RF. Crowded task performance in visually impaired children: magnifier versus large print. Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology 2013;251(7):1813‐9. - PubMed
John 2006 {published data only}
    1. John D, McRedmond B, Corn A, Sonsino J, Joos K. The effect of low vision optical devices on distance visual acuity and reading speeds in pediatric glaucoma patients. Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science 2006;47:ARVO E‐abstract 5831.
NCT00366392 {published data only}
    1. NCT00366392. Project magnify ‐ a comparison of two strategies (large print versus optical aids) for helping visually impaired students improve reading abilities. clinicaltrials.gov/show/NCT00366392 (accessed 2 July 2014).

Additional references

Ahn 1995a
    1. Ahn SJ, Legge GE. Psychophysics of reading‐XIII. Predictors of magnifier‐aided reading speed in low vision. Vision Research 1995;35(13):1931‐8. - PubMed
Ahn 1995b
    1. Ahn SJ, Legge GE, Luebker A. Printed cards for measuring low‐vision reading speed. Vision Research 1995;35(13):1939‐44. - PubMed
Bailey 2003
    1. Bailey IL, Hall‐Lueck A, Greer RB, Mon‐Tuan K, Bailey VM, Dornbusch HG. Understanding the relationship between print size and reading in low vision. Journal of Visual Impairment and Blindness 2003;97(6):325‐34.
Binns 2012
    1. Binns AM, Bunce C, Dickinson C, Harper R, Tudor‐Edwards R, Woodhouse M, et al. How effective is low vision service provision? A systematic review. Survey of Ophthalmology 2012;57(1):34‐65. - PubMed
Bodeau‐Livinec 2007
    1. Bodeau‐Livinec F, Surman G, Kaminski M, Wilkinson AR, Ancel PY, Kurinczuk JJ. Recent trends in visual impairment and blindness in the UK. Archives of Disease in Children 2007;92(12):1099‐104. - PMC - PubMed
Cochrane 2011
    1. Cochrane GM, Marella M, Keeffe JE, Lamoureux EL. The Impact of Vision Impairment for Children (IVI_C): validation of a vision‐specific pediatric quality‐of‐life questionnaire using Rasch analysis. Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science 2011;52(3):1632‐40. - PubMed
Corn 2002
    1. Corn AL, Koenig AJ. Literacy for students with low vision: A framework for delivering instruction. Journal of Visual Impairment and Blindness 2002;96(5):305‐21.
Cox 2009
    1. Cox RF, Reimer AM, Verezen CA, Smitsman AW, Vervloed MP, Boonstra NF. Young children's use of a visual aid: an experimental study of the effectiveness of training. Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology 2009;51(6):460‐7. - PubMed
de Carvalho 1998
    1. Carvalho KM, Minguini N, Moreira Filho DC, Kara‐Jose N. Characteristics of a pediatric low‐vision population. Journal of Pediatric Ophthalmology and Strabismus 1998;35(3):162‐5. - PubMed
Deeks 2011
    1. Deeks JJ, Higgins JPT, Altman DG (editors). Chapter 9: Analysing data and undertaking meta‐analyses. In: Higgins JPT, Green S (editors). Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 5.1.0 (updated March 2011). The Cochrane Collaboration, 2011. Available from www.cochrane‐handbook.org.
Dickinson 2000
    1. Dickinson CM, Fotinakis V. The limitations imposed on reading by low vision aids. Optometry and Vision Science 2000;77(7):364‐72. - PubMed
Douglas 2002
    1. Douglas G, Grimley M, Hill E, Long R, Tobin M. The use of the NARA for assessing the reading ability of children with low vision. British Journal of Visual Impairment 2002;20(2):69‐75.
Douglas 2004
    1. Douglas G, Grimley M, McLinden M, Watson L. Reading errors made by children with low vision. Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics 2004;24(4):319‐22. - PubMed
Douglas 2011
    1. Douglas G, McLinden M, McCall S, Pavey S, Ware J, Farrell AM. Access to print literacy for children and young people with visual impairment: findings from a review of the literature. European Journal of Special Needs Education 2011;26(1):25‐38.
Ducrey 1998
    1. Ducrey N, Mathis M, Goldschmidt M, Figueiredo V. Management of children with low vision [La prise en charge des enfants malvoyants]. Klinische Monatsblatter fur Augenheilkunde 1998;212(5):372‐5. - PubMed
Elbourne 2002
    1. Elbourne DR, Altman DG, Higgins JPT, Curtin F, Worthington HV, Vaillancourt JM. Meta‐analyses involving cross‐over trials: methodological issues. International Journal of Epidemiology 2002;31(1):140‐9. - PubMed
Gilbert 2001
    1. Gilbert C, Foster A. Blindness in children: control priorities and research opportunities. British Journal of Ophthalmology 2001;85(9):1025‐7. - PMC - PubMed
Gilbert 2008a
    1. Gilbert C, Muhit M. Twenty years of childhood blindness: what have we learnt?. Community Eye Health 2008;21(67):46‐7. - PMC - PubMed
Gilbert 2008b
    1. Gilbert CE, Ellwein LB. Prevalence and causes of functional low vision in school‐age children: results from standardized population surveys in Asia, Africa, and Latin America. Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science 2008;49(3):877‐81. - PubMed
Glanville 2006
    1. Glanville JM, Lefebvre C, Miles JN, Camosso‐Stefinovic J. How to identify randomized controlled trials in MEDLINE: ten years on. Journal of the Medical Library Association 2006;94(2):130‐6. - PMC - PubMed
Gnyawali 2012
    1. Gnyawali S, Shrestha JB, Bhattarai D, Upadhyay M. Optical needs of students with low vision in integrated schools of Nepal. Optometry and Vision Science 2012;89(12):1752‐6. - PubMed
Gompel 2004
    1. Gompel M, vanBon WHJ, Schreuder R. Reading by children with low vision. Journal of Visual Impairment and Blindness 2004;98(2):77‐89.
Gothwal 2015
    1. Gothwal VK, Bharani S, Mandal AK. Quality of life of caregivers of children with congenital glaucoma: development and validation of a novel questionnaire (CarCGQoL). Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science 2015;56(2):770‐7. - PubMed
GRADEpro 2014
    1. [Computer program on www.gradepro.org]. McMasters University, 2014:McMaster University.
Haddad 2006
    1. Haddad MA, Lobato FJ, Sampaio MW, Kara‐Jose N. Pediatric and adolescent population with visual impairment: study of 385 cases. Clinics 2006;61(3):239‐46. - PubMed
Haddad 2009
    1. Haddad MA, Sampaio MW, Oltrogge EW, Kara‐Jose N, Betinjane AJ. Visual impairment secondary to congenital glaucoma in children: visual responses, optical correction and use of low vision AIDS. Clinics 2009;64(8):725‐30. - PMC - PubMed
Harper 1999
    1. Harper R, Doorduyn K, Reeves B, Slater L. Evaluating the outcomes of low vision rehabilitation. Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics 1999;19(1):3‐11. - PubMed
Hassell 2000
    1. Hassell JB, Weih LM, Keeffe JE. A measure of handicap for low vision rehabilitation: the impact of vision impairment profile. Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology 2000;28(3):156‐61. - PubMed
Hazel 2000
    1. Hazel CA, Petre KL, Armstrong RA, Benson MT, Frost NA. Visual function and subjective quality of life compared in subjects with acquired macular disease. Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science 2000;41(6):1309‐15. - PubMed
Higgins 2011a
    1. Higgins JPT, Deeks JJ (editors). Chapter 7: Selecting studies and collecting data. In: Higgins JPT, Green S (editors), Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 5.1.0 (updated March 2011). The Cochrane Collaboration, 2011. Available from www.cochrane‐handbook.org.
Higgins 2011b
    1. Higgins JPT, Deeks JJ, Altman DG (editors). Chapter 16: Special topics in statistics. In: Higgins JPT, Green S (editors), Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 5.1.0 (updated March 2011). The Cochrane Collaboration, 2011. Available from www.cochrane‐handbook.org.
Higgins 2011c
    1. Higgins JPT, Altman DG, Sterne JAC (editors). Chapter 8: Assessing risk of bias in included studies. In: Higgins JPT, Green S (editors). Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 5.1.0 (updated March 2011). The Cochrane Collaboration, 2011. Available from www.cochrane‐handbook.org.
Hill 2005
    1. Hill E, Long R, Douglas G, Tobin M, Grimley M. Neale Analysis of Reading Ability for Readers with Low Vision. A Supplementary Manual to Aid the Assessment of Partially Sighted Pupils' Reading Using the Neale Analysis of Reading Ability (NARA). Birmingham, UK: Visual Impairment Centre for Teaching and Research; School of Education; University of Birmingham, 2005.
Khadka 2010
    1. Khadka J, Ryan B, Margrain TH, Court H, Woodhouse JM. Development of the 25‐item Cardiff Visual Ability Questionnaire for Children (CVAQC). British Journal of Ophthalmology 2010;94(6):730‐5. - PubMed
Legge 2007
    1. Legge GE. Psychophysics of Reading in Normal and Low Vision. NJ and London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 2007.
Mangione 1998
    1. Mangione CM, Berry S, Spritzer K, Janz NK, Klein R, Owsley C, et al. Identifying the content area for the 51‐item National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire: results from focus groups with visually impaired persons. Archives of Ophthalmology 1998;116(2):227‐33. - PubMed
Mangione 2001
    1. Mangione CM, Lee PP, Gutierrez PR, Spritzer K, Berry S, Hays RD. Development of the 25‐item National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire. Archives of Ophthalmology 2001;119(7):1050‐8. - PubMed
Margrain 2000
    1. Margrain TH. Helping blind and partially sighted people to read: the effectiveness of low vision aids. British Journal of Ophthalmology 2000;84(8):919‐21. - PMC - PubMed
Mason 1999
    1. Mason H. Blurred vision: a study of the use of low vision aids by visually impaired secondary school pupils. British Journal of Visual Impairment 1999;17(3):94‐7.
Massof 1998
    1. Massof RW. A systems model for low vision rehabilitation. II. Measurement of vision disabilities. Optometry and Vision Science 1998;75(5):349‐73. - PubMed
McClure 2000
    1. McClure ME, Hart PM, Jackson AJ, Stevenson MR, Chakravarthy U. Macular degeneration: do conventional measurements of impaired visual function equate with visual disability?. British Journal of Ophthalmology 2000;84(3):244‐50. - PMC - PubMed
Mitry 2013
    1. Mitry D, Bunce C, Wormald R, Leamon S, Simkiss P, Cumberland P, et al. Causes of certifications for severe sight impairment (blind) and sight impairment (partial sight) in children in England and Wales. British Journal of Ophthalmology 2013;97(11):1431‐6. - PubMed
Morris 2008
    1. Morris M, Smith P. Educational provision for blind and partially sighted children and young people in Britain. www.rnib.org.uk/aboutus/Research/reports/education/Pages/educational_pro.... London: National Foundation for Educational Research (NFER) for RNIB, 2008 (accessed 20 February 2013).
Neale 1997
    1. Neale MD. Neale Analysis of Reading Ability ‐ Revised: Manual for Schools. Windsor: NFER‐Nelson, 1997.
Rahi 2003
    1. Rahi JS, Cable N. Severe visual impairment and blindness in children in the UK. Lancet 2003;362(9393):1359‐65. - PubMed
RevMan 2014 [Computer program]
    1. The Nordic Cochrane Centre, The Cochrane Collaboration. Review Manager (RevMan). Version 5.3. Copenhagen: The Nordic Cochrane Centre, The Cochrane Collaboration, 2014.
Rubin 2013
    1. Rubin GS. Measuring reading performance. Vision Research 2013;90:43‐51. - PubMed
Shrestha 2012
    1. Shrestha JB, Gnyawali S, Upadhyay MP. Causes of blindness and visual impairment among students in integrated schools for the blind in Nepal. Ophthalmic Epidemiology 2012;19(6):401‐6. - PubMed
Sight Savers International 2003
    1. Sight Savers International. Current Status of the aetiology, prevalence and distribution of childhood blindness in Pakistan. pk.sightsavers.org/in_depth/policy_and_research/14313_Current%20status%2... 2003 (accessed 22 April 2013).
Silver 1976
    1. Silver J, Gould E. A study of some factors concerned in the schooling of visually handicapped children. Child: care, health and development 1976;2(3):145‐53. - PubMed
Tadic 2013
    1. Tadic V, Cooper A, Cumberland P, Lewando‐Hundt G, Rahi JS. Development of the Functional Vision Questionnaire for Children and Young People with Visual Impairment: The FVQ_CYP. Ophthalmology 2013;120(12):2725‐32. - PubMed
Trauzettel‐Klosinski 2012
    1. Trauzettel‐Klosinski S, Dietz K. Standardized assessment of reading performance: the New International Reading Speed Texts IReST. Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science 2012;53(9):5452‐61. - PubMed
Varni 2001
    1. Varni JW, Seid M, Kurtin PS. PedsQL 4.0: reliability and validity of the Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory version 4.0 Generic Core Scales in healthy and patient populations. Medical Care 2001;39(8):800‐12. - PubMed
Varni 2002
    1. Varni JW, Seid M, Knight TS, Uzark K, Szer IS. The PedsQL 4.0 Generic Core Scales: sensitivity, responsiveness, and impact on clinical decision‐making. Journal of Behavioral Medicine 2002;25(2):175‐93. - PubMed
Virgili 2013
    1. Virgili G, Acosta R, Grover LL, Bentley SA, Giacomelli G. Reading aids for adults with low vision. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2013, Issue 10. [DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD003303.pub3] - DOI - PMC - PubMed
Weih 2002
    1. Weih LM, Hassell JB, Keeffe J. Assessment of the impact of vision impairment. Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science 2002;43(4):927‐35. - PubMed
Wolffsohn 2000
    1. Wolffsohn JS, Cochrane AL. Design of the low vision quality‐of‐life questionnaire (LVQOL) and measuring the outcome of low‐vision rehabilitation. American Journal of Ophthalmology 2000;130(6):793‐802. - PubMed
World Health Organization 1992
    1. World Health Organization. Management of low vision in children. www.iceh.org.uk/display/WEB/Management+of+low+vision+in+children. Bangkok, 1992 (accessed 29 March 2013).
World Health Organization 2000
    1. World Health Organization. Preventing blindness in children. Report of a WHO/IAPB scientific meeting. www.who.int/ncd/vision2020_actionplan/documents/WHO_PBL_00.77.pdf. Geneva: WHO, 2000 (accessed 29 March 2013).
World Health Organization 2004
    1. World Health Organization. Magnitude and causes of visual impairment: fact sheet 282. www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs282/en/ 2004 (accessed 29 March 2013).

References to other published versions of this review

Barker 2014
    1. Barker L, Thomas R, Rubin G, Dahlmann‐Noor A. Optical reading aids for children and young people with low vision. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2014, Issue 2. [DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD010987] - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types