How the ESRD quality incentive program could potentially improve quality of life for patients on dialysis
- PMID: 25739850
- PMCID: PMC4422237
- DOI: 10.2215/CJN.07410714
How the ESRD quality incentive program could potentially improve quality of life for patients on dialysis
Abstract
For over 20 years, the quality of medical care of the Medicare ESRD Program has been a concern. The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services have implemented the ESRD Quality Incentive Program, which uses the principles of value-based purchasing; dialysis providers are paid for performance on predefined quality measures, with a goal of improving patient outcomes and the quality of patient care. The ESRD Quality Incentive Program measures have been criticized, because they are largely disease oriented and use easy-to-obtain laboratory-based indicators, such as Kt/V and hemoglobin, that do not reflect outcomes that are most important to patients and have had a minimal effect on survival or quality of life. A key goal of improving quality of care is to enhance quality of life, a patient-important quality measure that matters more to many patients than even survival. None of the ESRD Quality Incentive Program measures assess patient-reported quality of life. As outlined in the National Quality Strategy, the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services are holding providers accountable in six priority domains, in which quality measures have been and are being developed for value-based purchasing. Three measures-patient experience and engagement, clinical care, and care coordination-are particularly relevant to quality care in the ESRD Program; the 2014 ESRD Quality Incentive Program includes six measures, none of which provide data from a patient-centered perspective. Value-based purchasing is a well intentioned step to improve care of patients on dialysis. However, the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services need to implement significant change in what is measured for the ESRD Quality Incentive Program to be patient centered and aligned with patients' values, preferences, and needs. This paper provides examples of potential quality measures for patient experience and engagement, clinical care, and care coordination, which if implemented, would be much more likely to enhance quality of life for patients with ESRD than present ESRD Quality Incentive Program measures.
Keywords: ESRD; hemodialysis; quality measures; quality of care; quality of life.
Copyright © 2015 by the American Society of Nephrology.
Similar articles
-
Guiding principles and checklist for population-based quality metrics.Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2014 Jun 6;9(6):1124-31. doi: 10.2215/CJN.11061013. Epub 2014 Feb 20. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2014. PMID: 24558050 Free PMC article.
-
The ESRD Quality Incentive Program-Can We Bridge the Chasm?J Am Soc Nephrol. 2017 Jun;28(6):1697-1706. doi: 10.1681/ASN.2016101079. Epub 2017 Mar 15. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2017. PMID: 28298324 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Freestanding Dialysis Facility Quality Incentive Program Scores and Mortality Among Incident Dialysis Patients in the United States.Am J Kidney Dis. 2020 Feb;75(2):177-186. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2019.07.023. Epub 2019 Nov 1. Am J Kidney Dis. 2020. PMID: 31685294
-
The Role of Social Risk Factors in Dialysis Quality and Patient Outcomes Under a Medicare Quality Incentive Program.Med Care. 2022 Oct 1;60(10):735-742. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000001750. Epub 2022 Jul 26. Med Care. 2022. PMID: 35880769
-
Comparing mandated health care reforms: the Affordable Care Act, accountable care organizations, and the Medicare ESRD program.Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2012 Sep;7(9):1535-43. doi: 10.2215/CJN.01220212. Epub 2012 May 24. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2012. PMID: 22626961 Review.
Cited by
-
Methodological considerations in using patient reported measures in dialysis clinics.J Patient Rep Outcomes. 2017;1(1):11. doi: 10.1186/s41687-017-0010-9. Epub 2017 Nov 5. J Patient Rep Outcomes. 2017. PMID: 29757314 Free PMC article.
-
Palliative Care Disincentives in CKD: Changing Policy to Improve CKD Care.Am J Kidney Dis. 2018 Jun;71(6):866-873. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2017.12.017. Epub 2018 Mar 3. Am J Kidney Dis. 2018. PMID: 29510920 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Quality Measures for Dialysis: Time for a Balanced Scorecard.Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2016 Feb 5;11(2):363-8. doi: 10.2215/CJN.06010615. Epub 2015 Aug 27. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2016. PMID: 26316622 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Burden of Anemia in Chronic Kidney Disease: Beyond Erythropoietin.Adv Ther. 2021 Jan;38(1):52-75. doi: 10.1007/s12325-020-01524-6. Epub 2020 Oct 29. Adv Ther. 2021. PMID: 33123967 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Analgesic Use in Patients With Advanced Chronic Kidney Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Can J Kidney Health Dis. 2020 Mar 6;7:2054358120910329. doi: 10.1177/2054358120910329. eCollection 2020. Can J Kidney Health Dis. 2020. PMID: 35186302 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Rettig RA, Levinsky NG: Kidney Failure and the Federal Government, Washington, DC, National Academy of Sciences, 1991 - PubMed
-
- Parker T, 3rd, Hakim R, Nissenson AR, Steinman T, Glassock RJ: Dialysis at a crossroads: 50 years later. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 6: 457–461, 2011 - PubMed
-
- Evans RW, Manninen DL, Garrison LPJ, Jr., Hart LG, Blagg CR, Gutman RA, Hull AR, Lowrie EG: The quality of life of patients with end-stage renal disease. N Engl J Med 312: 553–559, 1985 - PubMed
-
- Conway PH, Mostashari F, Clancy C: The future of quality measurement for improvement and accountability. JAMA 309: 2215–2216, 2013 - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Research Materials