Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2015 Mar 31;84(13):1301-7.
doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000001413. Epub 2015 Mar 4.

Motor evoked potential polyphasia: a novel endophenotype of idiopathic generalized epilepsy

Affiliations

Motor evoked potential polyphasia: a novel endophenotype of idiopathic generalized epilepsy

Fahmida A Chowdhury et al. Neurology. .

Abstract

Objective: We compared the motor evoked potential (MEP) phases using transcranial magnetic stimulation in patients with idiopathic generalized epilepsy (IGE), their relatives, and healthy controls, hypothesizing that patients and their unaffected relatives may share a subtle pathophysiologic abnormality.

Methods: In a cross-sectional study, we investigated 23 patients with IGE, 34 first-degree relatives, and 30 matched healthy controls. Transcranial magnetic stimulation was performed to produce a series of suprathreshold single-pulse MEPs. A semiautomated method was used to count phases. We compared between groups the mean number of MEP phases, the stimulus-to-stimulus variability in MEP phases, and the proportion of polyphasic MEPs within subjects.

Results: Patients with IGE and their relatives had a significantly increased number of MEP phases (median for patients 2.24, relatives 2.17, controls 2.01) and a significantly higher proportion of MEPs with more than 2 phases than controls (median for patients 0.118, relatives 0.088, controls 0.013). Patients had a greater stimulus-to-stimulus variability in number of MEP phases than controls. There were no differences between patients and relatives.

Conclusion: Increased MEP polyphasia in patients with IGE and their first-degree relatives may reflect transient abnormal evoked oscillations. The presence of polyphasic MEPs in relatives as well as patients suggests that MEP polyphasia is not related to treatment, and is in isolation insufficient to predispose to epilepsy. Polyphasic MEP may be a novel endophenotype in IGE.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Motor evoked potential (MEP) from single transcranial magnetic stimulation pulse over contralateral motor cortex, recorded using surface EMG from first dorsal interosseus muscle
(A) A polyphasic MEP from a patient with idiopathic generalized epilepsy with a count of 4 phases. (B) A normal MEP from a healthy control subject.
Figure 2
Figure 2. Patients with idiopathic generalized epilepsy and first-degree relatives have significantly more polyphasic motor evoked potentials (MEPs) than healthy controls
(A) Within-subjects mean number of MEP phases across the 20 MEPs, illustrated for the patient, relative, and control groups. Box-and-whisker plot showing group median (horizontal line in box), 25th and 75th centiles (bottom and top of box), and minimum and maximum values (lower and upper whiskers). (B) Within-subjects interquartile range of the number of MEP phases across the 20 MEPs, illustrated for the patient, relative, and control groups. Box-and-whisker plot showing group median (horizontal line in box), 25th and 75th centiles (bottom and top of box), and minimum and maximum values (lower and upper whiskers). (C) Within-subjects proportion of MEPs with >2 phases across the 20 MEPs, illustrated for the patient, relative, and control groups. Box-and-whisker plot showing group median (horizontal line in box), 25th and 75th centiles (bottom and top of box), and minimum and maximum values (lower and upper whiskers).
Figure 3
Figure 3. Motor evoked potential (MEP) data for all subjects are summarized
For each subject, the proportion of MEPs with each specific number of phases (1 phase to 6 phases) was calculated; across each group of subjects, the median proportion of MEPs with each specific number of phases was estimated, and in addition the group minimum, 25th centile, 75th centile, and maximum. The data are displayed as box-and-whisker for each group and each number of MEP phases. The horizontal line in the box indicates the median proportion across the group, lower and upper limits of the box represent group 25th and 75th centiles, and the lower and upper whiskers represent the group minimum and maximum. Note that for most subjects in all groups, the proportion of MEPs with 2 phases is >0.8, whereas for most subjects in all groups, the proportion of MEPs with 1, 5, or 6 phases is zero. Note that compared with healthy control subjects, patients and relatives have a reduced proportion of MEPs with 2 phases, and an increased proportion of MEPs with >2 phases (especially 4 phases).

Comment in

References

    1. Badawy RA, Freestone DR, Lai A, Cook MJ. Epilepsy: ever-changing states of cortical excitability. Neuroscience 2012;222:89–99. - PubMed
    1. Gardiner M. Genetics of idiopathic generalized epilepsies. Epilepsia 2005;46(suppl 9):15–20. - PubMed
    1. Badawy RAB, Curatolo JM, Newton M, Berkovic SF, Macdonell RAL. Changes in cortical excitability differentiate generalized and focal epilepsy. Ann Neurol 2007;61:324–331. - PubMed
    1. Manganotti P, Tamburin S, Bongiovanni LG, Zanette G, Fiaschi A. Motor responses to afferent stimulation in juvenile myoclonic epilepsy. Epilepsia 2004;45:77–80. - PubMed
    1. Kohara N, Kaji R, Kojima Y, Kimura J. An electrophysiological study of the corticospinal projections in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Clin Neurophysiol 1999;110:1123–1132. - PubMed

Publication types

Supplementary concepts