Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2015 Feb 28;21(8):2490-6.
doi: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i8.2490.

Clinical observations on the treatment of prolapsing hemorrhoids with tissue selecting therapy

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Clinical observations on the treatment of prolapsing hemorrhoids with tissue selecting therapy

Zhi-Gang Wang et al. World J Gastroenterol. .

Abstract

Aim: To compare the effects and postoperative complications between tissue selecting therapy stapler (TST) and Milligan-Morgan hemorrhoidectomy (M-M).

Methods: Four hundred and eighty patients with severe prolapsing hemorrhoids, who were admitted to the Shenyang Coloproctology Hospital between 2009 and 2012, were randomly divided into observation (n=240) and control (n=240) groups. Hemorrhoidectomies were performed with TST in the observation group and with the M-M technique in the control group. The therapeutic effects, operation security, and postoperative complications in the two groups were compared. The immediate and long-term complications were assessed according to corresponding criteria. Pain was assessed on a visual analogue scale. The efficacy was assessed by specialized criteria. The follow-up was conducted one year after the operation.

Results: The total effective rates of the observation and control groups were 99.5% (217/218) and 98.6% (218/221) respectively; the difference was not statistically significant (P=0.322). Their were significant differences between observation and control groups in intraoperative blood loss (5.07±1.14 vs 2.45±0.57, P=0.000), pain (12 h after the surgery: 5.08±1.62 vs 7.19±2.01, P=0.000; at first dressing change: 2.64±0.87 vs 4.34±1.15, P=0.000; first defecation: 3.91±1.47 vs 5.63±1.98, P=0.001), urine retention (n=22 vs n=47, P=0.001), anal pendant expansion after the surgery (2.35±0.56 vs 5.16±1.42, P=0.000), operation time (18.3±5.6 min vs 29.5±8.2 min, P=0.000), and the length of hospital stay (5.3±0.6 d vs 11.4±1.8 d, P=0.000). Moreover TST showed significant reductions compared to M-M in the rates of long-term complications such as fecal incontinence (n=3 vs n=16, P=0.003), difficult bowel movement (n=1 vs n=9, P=0.011), intractable pain (n=2 vs n=12, P=0.007), and anal discharge (n=3 vs n=23, P=0.000).

Conclusion: TST for severe prolapsing hemorrhoids is a satisfactory technique for more rapid recovery, lower complication rates, and higher operation security.

Keywords: Complication rate; Milligan-Morgan hemorrhoidectomy; Operation security; Severe prolapsing hemorrhoids; Tissue selecting therapy stapler.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Patients with prolapsing hemorrhoids treated with tissue selecting therapy. A: The hemorrhoids were exposed; B: Absorable string was fixed in suitable location; C: Circular stapler was tightened and the gun was fired; D: The mucosal bridges were dissected.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Patients with prolapsing hemorrhoids treated with Milligan-Morgan hemorrhoidectomy. A: The hemorrhoids were exposed; B: Internal hemorrhoids were ligated; C: External hemorrhoids were dissected; D: The wound was repaired.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Argov S, Levandovsky O, Yarhi D. Milligan-Morgan hemorrhoidectomy under local anesthesia - an old operation that stood the test of time. A single-team experience with 2,280 operations. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2012;27:981–985. - PubMed
    1. Longo A. Treatment of hemorrhoidal disease by reduction of mucosa and hemorrhoidal prolapse with circular suturing device: a new procedure. In: Proceedings of the 6th World Congress of Endoscopic Surgery., editor. Bologna: Munduzzi; 1988. pp. 777–784.
    1. Fueglistaler P, Guenin MO, Montali I, Kern B, Peterli R, von Flüe M, Ackermann C. Long-term results after stapled hemorrhoidopexy: high patient satisfaction despite frequent postoperative symptoms. Dis Colon Rectum. 2007;50:204–212. - PubMed
    1. Lin HC, He QL, Ren DL, Peng H, Xie SK, Su D, Wang XX. Partial stapled hemorrhoidopexy: a minimally invasive technique for hemorrhoids. Surg Today. 2012;42:868–875. - PubMed
    1. Khubchandani IT. H.-C. Lin, D.-L. Ren, Q.-L. He, H. Peng, S.-K. Xie, D. Su, X.-X. Wang: Partial stapled hemorrhoidopexy versus circular stapled hemorrhoidopexy for grade III-IV prolapsing hemorrhoids: a two-year prospective controlled study. Tech Coloproctol. 2012;16:345; discussion 347–348. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms