The reality in the follow-up of breast cancer survivors: survey of Korean Breast Cancer Society
- PMID: 25741492
- PMCID: PMC4347047
- DOI: 10.4174/astr.2015.88.3.133
The reality in the follow-up of breast cancer survivors: survey of Korean Breast Cancer Society
Abstract
Purpose: Follow-up after primary treatment for breast cancer is an important component of survivor care and various international guidelines exist for the surveillance. However, little is known about current actual practice patterns of physicians whether they adhere to or deviate from recommended guidelines. The aim of this study was to determine how physicians follow-up their patients after primary treatment for breast cancer in Korea.
Methods: A questionnaire survey with 34 questions in 4 categories was e-mailed to the members of Korean Breast Cancer Society from November to December 2013. Respondents were asked how they use follow-up modalities after primary treatment of breast cancer and we compared the survey results with present guidelines.
Results: Of the 129 respondents, 123 (95.3%) were breast surgeons. The most important consideration in follow-up was tumor stage. History taking, physical examinations, and mammography were conducted in similar frequency recommended by other guidelines while breast ultrasonography was performed more often. The advanced imaging studies such as CT, MRI, and bone scan, which had been recommended to be conducted only if necessary, were also examined more frequently. Regular screenings for secondary malignancy were performed in 38 respondents (29.5%). Five years later after primary treatment, almost the whole respondents (94.6%) themselves monitored their patients.
Conclusion: A majority of respondents have been performed more intensive follow-up modalities in comparison with present guidelines and less frequently screenings for secondary malignancy. For optimal follow-up of breast cancer survivors, tailored delivery system should be considered.
Keywords: Breast neoplasms; Guideline; Surveillance; Survivors.
Conflict of interest statement
No potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Surveillance and beliefs about follow-up care among long-term breast cancer survivors: a comparison of primary care and oncology providers.J Cancer Surviv. 2016 Feb;10(1):96-102. doi: 10.1007/s11764-015-0454-y. Epub 2015 Jun 13. J Cancer Surviv. 2016. PMID: 26070279
-
American Society of Clinical Oncology-recommended surveillance and physician specialty among long-term breast cancer survivors.Cancer. 2010 May 1;116(9):2090-8. doi: 10.1002/cncr.25038. Cancer. 2010. PMID: 20198707
-
Current follow-up strategies after resection of colon cancer. Results of a survey of members of the American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons.Dis Colon Rectum. 1994 Jun;37(6):573-83. doi: 10.1007/BF02050993. Dis Colon Rectum. 1994. PMID: 8200237
-
Follow-up after treatment for breast cancer. The Steering Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines for the Care and Treatment of Breast Cancer.CMAJ. 1998 Feb 10;158 Suppl 3:S65-70. CMAJ. 1998. PMID: 9484280 Review.
-
Filling the Gap for Early-Stage Breast Cancer Follow-Up: An Overview for Primary Care Providers.J Midwifery Womens Health. 2016 Mar-Apr;61(2):166-76; quiz 284. doi: 10.1111/jmwh.12439. J Midwifery Womens Health. 2016. PMID: 27037535 Review.
Cited by
-
Nationwide Analysis of Treatment Patterns for Korean Breast Cancer Survivors Using National Health Insurance Service Data.J Korean Med Sci. 2018 Oct 1;33(44):e276. doi: 10.3346/jkms.2018.33.e276. eCollection 2018 Oct 29. J Korean Med Sci. 2018. PMID: 30369858 Free PMC article.
-
Intensity of metastasis screening and survival outcomes in patients with breast cancer.Sci Rep. 2021 Feb 2;11(1):2851. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-82485-w. Sci Rep. 2021. PMID: 33531549 Free PMC article.
-
Nomogram for accurate prediction of breast and axillary pathologic response after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in node positive patients with breast cancer.Ann Surg Treat Res. 2019 Apr;96(4):169-176. doi: 10.4174/astr.2019.96.4.169. Epub 2019 Mar 28. Ann Surg Treat Res. 2019. PMID: 30941320 Free PMC article.
-
Contrast-Enhanced Chest Computed Tomography for In-Breast Recurrence Detection: Clinical and Imaging Predictors of Visibility.Diagnostics (Basel). 2025 Feb 7;15(4):407. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics15040407. Diagnostics (Basel). 2025. PMID: 40002558 Free PMC article.
-
Validity of breast-specific gamma imaging for Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System 4 lesions on mammography and/or ultrasound.Ann Surg Treat Res. 2016 Apr;90(4):194-200. doi: 10.4174/astr.2016.90.4.194. Epub 2016 Mar 30. Ann Surg Treat Res. 2016. PMID: 27073789 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Statistics Korea, Korean Statistical Information Service. 2013 Cancer registry statistics in Korea [Internet] Daejeon: Statistics Korea, Korean Statistical Information Service; 1996. [cited 2014 Jul 15]. Available from: http://kosis.kr.
-
- Burstein HJ, Winer EP. Primary care for survivors of breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 2000;343:1086–1094. - PubMed
-
- Emens LA, Davidson NE. The follow-up of breast cancer. Semin Oncol. 2003;30:338–348. - PubMed
-
- Dalberg K, Mattsson A, Sandelin K, Rutqvist LE. Outcome of treatment for ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence in early-stage breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 1998;49:69–78. - PubMed
-
- Palli D, Russo A, Saieva C, Ciatto S, Rosselli Del Turco M, Distante V, et al. Intensive vs clinical follow-up after treatment of primary breast cancer: 10-year update of a randomized trial. National Research Council Project on Breast Cancer Follow-up. JAMA. 1999;281:1586. - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources