Success rate and complications of internal jugular vein catheterization with and without ultrasonography guide
- PMID: 25741514
- PMCID: PMC4348724
- DOI: 10.17795/nmsjournal23204
Success rate and complications of internal jugular vein catheterization with and without ultrasonography guide
Abstract
Background: Central venous catheterization (CVC) is an important procedure in emergency departments (EDs). Despite existence of ultrasonography (US) devices in every ED, CVC is done using anatomical landmarks in many EDs in Iran.
Objectives: This study aimed to compare the traditional landmark method vs. US-guided method of CVC placement in terms of complications and success rate.
Patients and methods: In this randomized controlled trial, patients who were candidate for internal jugular vein catheterization, and referred to Baqiyatallah Hospital ED were randomly allocated into US-guided CVC and anatomical landmarks guided CVC groups. Central vein access time, number of attempts, success rate, and complications in each group were evaluated. Mann-Whitney U, chi-square and Fisher exact tests along with Pearson and Spearman correlation coefficients were used to analyze the data.
Results: Out of 100 patients, 56 were male and 44 were female. No significant differences were found between the US-guided and traditional landmark methods of CVC insertion in terms of age, gender, BMI, and site of catheter insertion. The mean access time was significantly lower in the US-guided group (37.12 ± 17.33 s vs. 63.42 ± 35.19 s, P < 0.001). The mean number of attempts was also significantly lower in the US-guided group (1.12 ± 0.3 vs. 1.58 ± 0.64 times, P < 0.001). Eighty-eight percent of patients in the US-guided group were catheterized in the first attempt, while 50% of patients in the traditional landmark group were catheterized in the second or more attempts (P < 0.001). The success rate was 100% in the US-guided group, while it was 88% in the landmark group (P = 0.013). Moreover, the rate of complications was significantly lower in the US-guided group (4% vs. 24%, P = 0.004).
Conclusions: The US-guided method for CVC placement was superior to the traditional landmark method in terms of access time, number of attempts, success rate, and fewer complications.
Keywords: Central Venous Catheterization; Jugular Vein; Ultrasonography.
Similar articles
-
Ultrasound-guided central venous catheter placement increases success rates in pediatric patients: a meta-analysis.Pediatr Res. 2016 Aug;80(2):178-84. doi: 10.1038/pr.2016.74. Epub 2016 Apr 8. Pediatr Res. 2016. PMID: 27057741 Review.
-
Ultrasound-guided external jugular vein cannulation for central venous access by inexperienced trainees.Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2010 Mar;27(3):300-3. doi: 10.1097/EJA.0b013e328333c2d6. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2010. PMID: 19935072 Clinical Trial.
-
Real-time ultrasonographically-guided internal jugular vein catheterization in the emergency department increases success rates and reduces complications: a randomized, prospective study.Ann Emerg Med. 2006 Nov;48(5):540-7. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2006.01.011. Epub 2006 Feb 21. Ann Emerg Med. 2006. PMID: 17052555 Clinical Trial.
-
Ultrasound-guided central venous catheter placement decreases complications and decreases placement attempts compared with the landmark technique in patients in a pediatric intensive care unit.Crit Care Med. 2009 Mar;37(3):1090-6. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e31819b570e. Crit Care Med. 2009. PMID: 19237922
-
Ultrasound-guided central venous catheter placement: a structured review and recommendations for clinical practice.Crit Care. 2017 Aug 28;21(1):225. doi: 10.1186/s13054-017-1814-y. Crit Care. 2017. PMID: 28844205 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Effect of ultrasound-guided central venous catheter insertion on the incidence of catheter-related bloodstream infections and mechanical complications.BMC Infect Dis. 2019 Oct 16;19(1):857. doi: 10.1186/s12879-019-4487-0. BMC Infect Dis. 2019. PMID: 31619174 Free PMC article.
-
Ultrasound-guided central venous catheter placement increases success rates in pediatric patients: a meta-analysis.Pediatr Res. 2016 Aug;80(2):178-84. doi: 10.1038/pr.2016.74. Epub 2016 Apr 8. Pediatr Res. 2016. PMID: 27057741 Review.
-
Ultrasonography and Italian anesthesiology: a national cross-sectional study.J Ultrasound. 2019 Mar;22(1):77-83. doi: 10.1007/s40477-018-0334-1. Epub 2018 Nov 1. J Ultrasound. 2019. PMID: 30387039 Free PMC article.
-
Identifying diversity of patient anatomy through automated image analysis of clinical ultrasounds.J Ultrasound. 2024 Sep;27(3):635-643. doi: 10.1007/s40477-024-00908-6. Epub 2024 Jun 23. J Ultrasound. 2024. PMID: 38910220 Free PMC article.
-
Central Venous Cannulation of the Internal Jugular Vein Both With and Without Ultrasound Guidance in Iran.Anesth Pain Med. 2016 Jul 26;6(5):e39256. doi: 10.5812/aapm.39256. eCollection 2016 Oct. Anesth Pain Med. 2016. PMID: 27847702 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
References
-
- Salwender HJ, Egerer G, Bach A, Hahn U, Goldschmidt H, Ho AD. Central venous catheter-related complications. Antibiot Chemother (1971). 2000;50:133–43. - PubMed
-
- Dimick JB, Pelz RK, Consunji R, Swoboda SM, Hendrix CW, Lipsett PA. Increased resource use associated with catheter-related bloodstream infection in the surgical intensive care unit. Arch Surg. 2001;136(2):229–34. - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources