Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2015 May;68(5):394-6.
doi: 10.1136/jclinpath-2014-202833. Epub 2015 Mar 5.

Testing implications of varying targets for Bordetella pertussis: comparison of the FilmArray Respiratory Panel and the Focus B. pertussis PCR assay

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Testing implications of varying targets for Bordetella pertussis: comparison of the FilmArray Respiratory Panel and the Focus B. pertussis PCR assay

Robert C Jerris et al. J Clin Pathol. 2015 May.

Abstract

Background: The FilmArray Respiratory Panel (RP) detects multiple pathogens, including Bordetella pertussis. The multiplex PCR system is appropriate for a core laboratory or point of care due to ease of use. The purpose of this study is to compare the analytical sensitivity of the FilmArray RP, which targets the promoter region of the B. pertussis toxin gene, with the Focus real-time PCR assay, which targets the insertion sequence IS481.

Methods: Seventy-one specimens from patients aged 1 month to 18 years, which had tested positive for B. pertussis using the Focus assay, were analysed using the FilmArray RP.

Results: Forty-six specimens were positive for B. pertussis by both the Focus and the FilmArray RP assays. Twenty-five specimens were negative for B. pertussis using the FilmArray RP assay, but positive using the Focus assay.

Conclusions: The FilmArray RP assays will detect approximately 1/3 less cases of B. pertussis than the Focus assay.

Keywords: BORDETELLA PERTUSSIS; MICROBIOLOGY; MOLECULAR PATHOLOGY.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Rodgers L, Martin SW, Cohn A, et al. . Epidemiologic and laboratory features of a large outbreak of pertussis-like illnesses associated with cocirculating Bordetella holmesii and Bordetella pertussis—Ohio, 2010–2011. Clin Infect Dis 2013;56:322–31. 10.1093/cid/cis888 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Tatti KM, Sparks KN, Boney KO, et al. . Novel multitarget real-time PCR assay for rapid detection of Bordetella species in clinical specimens. J Clin Microbiol 2011;49:4059–66. 10.1128/JCM.00601-11 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Tizolova A, Guiso N, Guillot S. Insertion sequences shared by Bordetella species and implications for the biological diagnosis of pertussis syndrome. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 2013;32:89–96. 10.1007/s10096-012-1718-3 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bottero D, Griffith MM, Lara C, et al. . Bordetella holmesii in children suspected of pertussis in Argentina. Epidemiol Infection 2013;141:714–17. 10.1017/S095026881200132X - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Reischl U, Lehn N, Sanden GN, et al. . Real-time PCR assay targeting IS481 of Bordetella pertussis and molecular basis for detecting Bordetella holmesii. J Clin Microbiol, 2001;39:1963–6. 10.1128/JCM.39.5.1963-1966.2001 - DOI - PMC - PubMed