Dual-use decision making: relational and positional issues
- PMID: 25743058
- PMCID: PMC4361726
- DOI: 10.1007/s40592-015-0026-y
Dual-use decision making: relational and positional issues
Abstract
Debates about dual-use research often turn on the potential for scientific research to be used to benefit or harm humanity. This dual-use potential is conventionally understood as the product of the magnitude of the harms and benefits of dual-use research, multiplied by their likelihood. This account, however, neglects important social aspects of the use of science and technology. In this paper, I supplement existing conceptions of dual-use potential to account for the social context of dual-use research. This account incorporates relational and positional concerns that feature in the success or failure of dual-use. I then defend this account against foreseeable objections.
References
-
- Babcock, Linda, George Loewenstein, Samuel Issacharoff, and Colin Camerer. 1995. Biased Judgments of Fairness in Bargaining. The American Economic Review 85(5): 1337–1343.
-
- Bratman, Michael E. 1991. Shared Cooperative Activity. The Philosophical Review 101 (2):327–341. http://web.media.mit.edu/~cynthiab/Readings/bratman-PhilRev-92.pdf.
-
- Carlson Robert H. Biology is technology: The promise, peril, and new business of engineering life. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press; 2010.
-
- Chang, David. 2014. “Man accused of sending ricin-laced card to romantic rival.” NBC 10 Philadelphia. http://www.nbcphiladelphia.com/news/local/Crews-Respond-to-Barricade-Haz....
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical