Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2015 Mar 28;113(6):923-34.
doi: 10.1017/S0007114514003201. Epub 2015 Mar 6.

Effect of bovine colostrum feeding in comparison with milk replacer and natural feeding on the immune responses and colonisation of enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli in the intestinal tissue of piglets

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Effect of bovine colostrum feeding in comparison with milk replacer and natural feeding on the immune responses and colonisation of enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli in the intestinal tissue of piglets

Sugiharto Sugiharto et al. Br J Nutr. .

Abstract

The present study investigated the effect of feeding bovine colostrum (BC) to piglets in comparison with feeding a milk replacer (MR) and conventional rearing by the sow on the intestinal immune system and number of enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli (ETEC) colonising the intestinal tissue. Piglets (23-d-old) were allocated to one of the following four groups: (1) killed at the beginning of the experiment (Base); (2) separated from the sow and fed BC (BC-fed); (3) separated from the sow and fed a MR (MR-fed); (4) kept with the sow (Sow-Milk). Blood was sampled on days 1 and 8, and faecal samples were collected on days 1, 3, 5 and 8. On day 8, piglets were killed and gastrointestinal digesta and intestinal segments were collected. The frequency of diarrhoea was found to be higher (P≤ 0·019) in MR-fed piglets than in BC-fed and Sow-Milk piglets. Piglets from the MR-fed group had the lowest lactic acid bacteria:haemolytic E. coli ratio (P(treat)= 0·064) in the faeces. The number of E. coli colonising the intestinal tissue was higher (P< 0·001) in piglets from the MR-fed group than in those from the BC-fed and Sow-Milk groups. Piglets from the Sow-Milk group had a higher (P= 0·020) mucosal IgG concentration than those from the MR-fed group, but did not exhibit any difference when compared with piglets from the Base and BC-fed groups. Piglets from the BC-fed group exhibited a reduced (P≤ 0·037) expression level of Toll-like receptor-4 in the intestinal mucosa when compared with those from the MR-fed and Sow-Milk groups. The expression level of IL-2 was higher (P≤ 0·051) in piglets from the MR-fed group than in those from the other treatment groups. In conclusion, feeding BC rather than MR to the piglets reduced the colonisation of intestine by ETEC and modulated the intestinal immune system, whereas no differences were observed in piglets fed BC and conventionally reared by the sows.

Keywords: Weak piglets.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Lactic acid bacteria:haemolytic Escherichia coli ratio (A) and lactic acid bacteria:total coliform bacteria ratio (B) in the faeces of piglets. Values are least-squares means, with their standard errors represented by vertical bars. a,b,cMean values with unlike letters were significantly different (P≤ 0·05). Four piglets were analysed per treatment and day of experiment (faecal sampling). BC-fed (–●–), piglets separated from the sow and fed bovine colostrum; MR-fed (–○–), piglets separated from the sow and fed a commercial milk replacer; Sow-Milk (–▾–), piglets kept with the sow. (A) P treat= 0·064; P day= 0·029; P treat × day= 0·325. (B) P treat= 0·143; P day= 0·784; P treat × day= 0·626.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Lactic acid bacteria:haemolytic E. coli ratio (A) and lactic acid bacteria:total coliform bacteria ratio (B) in the gastrointestinal digesta of piglets. Values are least-squares means, with their standard errors represented by vertical bars. a,bMean values with unlike letters were significantly different (P≤ 0·05). Four piglets were analysed per treatment and gastrointestinal segment. Base (formula image), piglets killed at the beginning of the experiment; BC-fed (formula image), piglets separated from the sow and fed bovine colostrum; MR-fed (formula image), piglets separated from the sow and fed a commercial milk replacer; Sow-Milk (formula image), piglets kept with the sow. SI, small intestine. (A) P treat= 0·068; P seg< 0·001; P treat × seg= 0·055. (B) P treat= 0·302; P seg< 0·001; P treat × seg= 0·033.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Gene expression levels of Toll-like receptor-4 (A), cyclo-oxygenase-2 (B), TNF-α (C), IL-2 (D), IL-10 (E) and transforming growth factor-β1 (F) in the intestinal mucosa of piglets. Values are least-squares means with their standard errors represented by vertical bars. a,bMean values with unlike letters were significantly different (P≤ 0·05). Four piglets were analysed per treatment and small-intestinal segment. Base (formula image), piglets killed at the beginning of the experiment; BC-fed (formula image), piglets separated from the sow and fed bovine colostrum; MR-fed (formula image), piglets separated from the sow and fed a commercial milk replacer; Sow-Milk (formula image), piglets kept with the sow. (A) P treat= 0·011; P seg= 0·010; P treat × seg= 0·726. (B) P treat= 0·046; P seg= 0·007; P treat × seg= 0·183. (C) P treat= 0·100; P seg= 0·009; P treat × seg= 0·500. (D) P treat= 0·009; P seg= 0·171; P treat × seg= 0·074. (E) P treat= 0·022; P seg= 0·005; P treat × seg= 0·191. (F) P treat= 0·161; P seg= 0·002; P treat × seg= 0·720.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Rutherford KMD, Baxter EM, D'Eath RB, et al. (2013) The welfare implications of large litter size in the domestic pig I: biological factors. Anim Welfare 22, 199–218.
    1. Wolf J, Žáková E & Groeneveld E (2008) Within-litter variation of birth weight in hyperprolific Czech Large White sows and its relation to litter size traits, stillborn piglets and losses until weaning. Livest Sci 115, 195–205.
    1. De Vos M, Huygelen V, Willemen S, et al. (2014) Artificial rearing of piglets: effects on small intestinal morphology and digestion capacity. Livest Sci 159, 165–173.
    1. Boudry C, Dehoux J-P, Portetelle D, et al. (2008) Bovine colostrum as a natural growth promoter for newly weaned piglets: a review. Biotechnol Agron Soc Environ 12, 157–170.
    1. Nguyen TV, Yuan L, Azevedo MS, et al. (2007) Transfer of maternal cytokines to suckling piglets: in vivo and in vitro models with implications for immunomodulation of neonatal immunity. Vet Immunol Immunopathol 117, 236–248. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms