Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2015 Mar;76(2):164-74.
doi: 10.1007/s00056-014-0279-8.

Novel lingual retainer created using CAD/CAM technology: evaluation of its positioning accuracy

[Article in English, German]
Affiliations

Novel lingual retainer created using CAD/CAM technology: evaluation of its positioning accuracy

[Article in English, German]
M Wolf et al. J Orofac Orthop. 2015 Mar.

Abstract

Objectives: Permanent retention is currently the method of choice to stabilize orthodontic treatment results. Frequently, permanent retention schemes are adopted to prevent posttreatment changes in the esthetic zone of the anterior teeth. With increasingly prolonged times of intraoral device use, and retention to be provided in the maxilla despite limited space, the demands placed on well-planned and precise retainer positioning are becoming more exacting. The aim of the present study was to analyze the intraoral precision of lingual retainers made using computer-aided design and machining (CAD/CAM).

Materials and methods: A custom manufacturer (Retaintechnology; Cologne, Germany) employing innovative CAD/CAM technology was commissioned to fabricate 16 lingual retainers. Following intraoral insertion using the manufacturer's recommended transfer system, impressions of the intraoral situations were taken and scanned for digitization. On this basis, the intraoral retainer positions were compared to the preceding virtual setups by superimposition with the manufacturer's datasets. Three-dimensional processing software (Geomagic Qualify 2012; Geomagic) was used to analyze the retainers, based on a total of 80 interproximal sites, for deviations from their planned positions along the horizontal (x-), sagittal (y-), and vertical (z-) axes. These deviations of the achieved from the intended positions were considered clinically relevant if ≥ 0.5 mm and, based on this premise, were subjected to a t-test with statistical software (Prism; GraphPad).

Results: The intraoral retainer positions were found to correlate closely with the preceding virtual setups (i.e., the positions as they had been planned by the custom manufacturer). Positional deviations were significantly less than 0.5 mm. They were very small in the horizontal and sagittal planes and moderately larger in the vertical plane.

Conclusion: Highly precise intraoral results may be achieved by transferring three-dimensional virtual setups for lingual retainers to the actual patients. This CAD/CAM strategy of making retainers can offer high predictability even in anatomically demanding regions and in the presence of limited space.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Am J Orthod. 1981 Oct;80(4):349-65 - PubMed
    1. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1989 Nov;96(5):397-404 - PubMed
    1. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2008 Jan;133(1):70-6 - PubMed
    1. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2013 Aug;144(2):169-75 - PubMed
    1. Am J Orthod. 1967 Oct;53(10):721-45 - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources