The contributions of breast density and common genetic variation to breast cancer risk
- PMID: 25745020
- PMCID: PMC4598340
- DOI: 10.1093/jnci/dju397
The contributions of breast density and common genetic variation to breast cancer risk
Abstract
We evaluated whether a 76-locus polygenic risk score (PRS) and Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) breast density were independent risk factors within three studies (1643 case patients, 2397 control patients) using logistic regression models. We incorporated the PRS odds ratio (OR) into the Breast Cancer Surveillance Consortium (BCSC) risk-prediction model while accounting for its attributable risk and compared five-year absolute risk predictions between models using area under the curve (AUC) statistics. All statistical tests were two-sided. BI-RADS density and PRS were independent risk factors across all three studies (P interaction = .23). Relative to those with scattered fibroglandular densities and average PRS (2(nd) quartile), women with extreme density and highest quartile PRS had 2.7-fold (95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.74 to 4.12) increased risk, while those with low density and PRS had reduced risk (OR = 0.30, 95% CI = 0.18 to 0.51). PRS added independent information (P < .001) to the BCSC model and improved discriminatory accuracy from AUC = 0.66 to AUC = 0.69. Although the BCSC-PRS model was well calibrated in case-control data, independent cohort data are needed to test calibration in the general population.
© The Author 2015. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.
Similar articles
-
Breast cancer risk prediction using a clinical risk model and polygenic risk score.Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2016 Oct;159(3):513-25. doi: 10.1007/s10549-016-3953-2. Epub 2016 Aug 26. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2016. PMID: 27565998 Free PMC article.
-
Combining quantitative and qualitative breast density measures to assess breast cancer risk.Breast Cancer Res. 2017 Aug 22;19(1):97. doi: 10.1186/s13058-017-0887-5. Breast Cancer Res. 2017. PMID: 28830497 Free PMC article.
-
Joint association of mammographic density adjusted for age and body mass index and polygenic risk score with breast cancer risk.Breast Cancer Res. 2019 May 22;21(1):68. doi: 10.1186/s13058-019-1138-8. Breast Cancer Res. 2019. PMID: 31118087 Free PMC article.
-
Breast cancer genetic risk profile is differentially associated with interval and screen-detected breast cancers.Ann Oncol. 2015 Mar;26(3):517-22. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdu565. Epub 2014 Dec 8. Ann Oncol. 2015. PMID: 25488685
-
Addition of a polygenic risk score, mammographic density, and endogenous hormones to existing breast cancer risk prediction models: A nested case-control study.PLoS Med. 2018 Sep 4;15(9):e1002644. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1002644. eCollection 2018 Sep. PLoS Med. 2018. PMID: 30180161 Free PMC article.
Cited by
-
Population-based screening for cancer: hope and hype.Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2016 Sep;13(9):550-65. doi: 10.1038/nrclinonc.2016.50. Epub 2016 Apr 13. Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2016. PMID: 27071351 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Identifying women with dense breasts at high risk for interval cancer: a cohort study.Ann Intern Med. 2015 May 19;162(10):673-81. doi: 10.7326/M14-1465. Ann Intern Med. 2015. PMID: 25984843 Free PMC article.
-
Validation of a breast cancer risk prediction model based on the key risk factors: family history, mammographic density and polygenic risk.Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2023 Apr;198(2):335-347. doi: 10.1007/s10549-022-06834-7. Epub 2023 Feb 7. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2023. PMID: 36749458 Free PMC article.
-
Genetic Epidemiology of Breast Cancer in Latin America.Genes (Basel). 2019 Feb 18;10(2):153. doi: 10.3390/genes10020153. Genes (Basel). 2019. PMID: 30781715 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Update Breast Cancer 2019 Part 1 - Implementation of Study Results of Novel Study Designs in Clinical Practice in Patients with Early Breast Cancer.Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd. 2019 Mar;79(3):256-267. doi: 10.1055/a-0842-6614. Epub 2019 Mar 12. Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd. 2019. PMID: 30880824 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Kolb TM, Lichy J, Newhouse JH. Comparison of the performance of screening mammography, physical examination, and breast US and evaluation of factors that influence them: an analysis of 27,825 patient evaluations. Radiology. 2002;225(1):165–175. - PubMed
-
- Pisano ED, Gatsonis C, Hendrick E, et al. Diagnostic performance of digital versus film mammography for breast-cancer screening. N Engl J Med. 2005;353(17):1773–1783. - PubMed
-
- McCormack VA, dos Santos Silva I. Breast density and parenchymal patterns as markers of breast cancer risk: a meta-analysis. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2006;15(6):1159–1169. - PubMed
-
- National Cancer Institute. Breast Cancer Surveillance Consortium 2011. Available at: http://breastscreening.cancer.gov/data/variables/2011/freq_tables_pct.ht....
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
- R01 CA128931/CA/NCI NIH HHS/United States
- CA15083/CA/NCI NIH HHS/United States
- P01 CA154292/CA/NCI NIH HHS/United States
- R01 CA128978/CA/NCI NIH HHS/United States
- P30 CA015083/CA/NCI NIH HHS/United States
- K24 CA169004/CA/NCI NIH HHS/United States
- R01 CA97396/CA/NCI NIH HHS/United States
- R01CA140286/CA/NCI NIH HHS/United States
- R01 CA097396/CA/NCI NIH HHS/United States
- P50 CA116201/CA/NCI NIH HHS/United States
- R01CA240386/CA/NCI NIH HHS/United States
- R21 CA179442/CA/NCI NIH HHS/United States
- 16563/CRUK_/Cancer Research UK/United Kingdom
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical