Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2016 Feb;122(2):565-72.
doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000000605.

Continuous Noninvasive Hemoglobin Monitoring: A Measured Response to a Critical Review

Affiliations
Review

Continuous Noninvasive Hemoglobin Monitoring: A Measured Response to a Critical Review

Steven J Barker et al. Anesth Analg. 2016 Feb.

Abstract

Supplemental Digital Content is available in the text.

Published ahead of print March 5, 2015

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of Interest: See Disclosures at the end of the article.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Changes in hemoglobin from a hematology analyzer compared with changes in SpHb, CO-Oximeter, and HemoCue (N = 471 measurements in 62 surgical intensive care subjects). Adapted from Frasca et al. 2011.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Trend plot of a surgical case in which blinded SpHb values (red line) are shown with lab-Hb measurements from both a CO-Oximeter (blue circles) and hematology analyzer (purple triangles). Note in (A) the larger-than-expected difference between lab-Hb values from 2 different devices. B and C, How differences between lab-Hb and single SpHb values during a time of rapidly changing hemoglobin can be misleading. D, The variation between 2 lab-Hb devices can change. Actual patient trend plot courtesy of Masimo.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
Revision “K” SpHb sensors (shown in red) have less variability than earlier revision SpHb sensors (shown in dark blue) during side perfusion variation and fewer dropouts during low perfusion (0.3%–1% Perfusion Index, shown in cyan), demonstrating improved trending accuracy compared with lab-Hb (shown in blue diamonds). Actual patient trend plot courtesy of Masimo.
Figure 4.
Figure 4.
Trend plot of a liver transplant surgery in which visible SpHb values (red line) are shown with lab-Hb measurements (purple triangles). The last lab-Hb value before the time marked as 7:57 was >8 g/dL. As the surgeon was closing and with no significant change in vital signs, SpHb values began to drop while pleth variability index (PVI) began to rise, which is associated with reduced intravascular volume status. Due to the changing SpHb values, another blood sample was taken, later revealing a lab-Hb <5 g/dL. The dropping SpHb values caused the surgeon to stop wound closure and re-explore the abdomen. A large volume of blood was found behind the liver and bleeding vessel repaired. The SpHb values decreased <3 g/dL, and RBC transfusion was initiated as hemodynamic instability occurred. The aggressive transfusion that followed resulted in an over transfusion as the SpHb reached 14 g/dL. Actual patient trend plot courtesy of Masimo.

Comment in

  • Disclosures, What Is Necessary and Sufficient?
    Shelley KH, Barker SJ. Shelley KH, et al. Anesth Analg. 2016 Feb;122(2):307-8. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000000742. Anesth Analg. 2016. PMID: 26797547 No abstract available.
  • All Boxes Are Black.
    Cannesson M, Shafer SL. Cannesson M, et al. Anesth Analg. 2016 Feb;122(2):309-17. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000001122. Anesth Analg. 2016. PMID: 26797548 No abstract available.
  • Enough Information to Evaluate Clinical Monitors?
    Bickler PE. Bickler PE. Anesth Analg. 2016 Jul;123(1):254-5. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000001342. Anesth Analg. 2016. PMID: 27314698 No abstract available.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Davis BH, Jungerius B International Council for the Standardization of Haematology (ICSH) International Council for Standardization in Haematology technical report 1—2009: new reference material for haemiglobincyanide for use in standardization of blood haemoglobin measurements. Int J Lab Hematol. 2010;32:139–41. - PubMed
    1. Zwart A, van Assendelft OW, Bull BS, England JM, Lewis SM, Zijlstra WG. Recommendations for reference method for haemoglobinometry in human blood (ICSH standard 1995) and specifications for international haemiglobinocyanide standard (4th edition). J Clin Pathol. 1996;49:271–4. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Rice MJ, Gravenstein N, Morey TE. Noninvasive hemoglobin monitoring: how accurate is enough? Anesth Analg. 2013;117:902–7. - PubMed
    1. Morey TE, Gravenstein N, Rice MJ. Let’s think clinically instead of mathematically about device accuracy. Anesth Analg. 2011;113:89–91. - PubMed
    1. Morey TE, Gravenstein N, Rice MJ. Assessing point-of-care hemoglobin measurement: be careful we don’t bias with bias. Anesth Analg. 2011;113:1289–91. - PubMed