Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2015 May;60(4):401-10.
doi: 10.1007/s00038-015-0669-8. Epub 2015 Mar 7.

Educational inequalities in diabetes mortality across Europe in the 2000s: the interaction with gender

Affiliations

Educational inequalities in diabetes mortality across Europe in the 2000s: the interaction with gender

Hadewijch Vandenheede et al. Int J Public Health. 2015 May.

Abstract

Objectives: To evaluate educational inequalities in diabetes mortality in Europe in the 2000s, and to assess whether these inequalities differ between genders.

Methods: Data were obtained from mortality registries covering 14 European countries. To determine educational inequalities in diabetes mortality, age-standardised mortality rates, mortality rate ratios, and slope and relative indices of inequality were calculated. To assess whether the association between education and diabetes mortality differs between genders, diabetes mortality was regressed on gender, educational rank and 'gender × educational rank'.

Results: An inverse association between education and diabetes mortality exists in both genders across Europe. Absolute educational inequalities are generally larger among men than women; relative inequalities are generally more pronounced among women, the relative index of inequality being 2.8 (95 % CI 2.0-3.9) in men versus 4.8 (95 % CI 3.2-7.2) in women. Gender inequalities in diabetes mortality are more marked in the highest than the lowest educated.

Conclusions: Education and diabetes mortality are inversely related in Europe in the 2000s. This association differs by gender, indicating the need to take the socioeconomic and gender dimension into account when developing public health policies.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Abbate R, Mannucci E, Cioni G, Fatini C, Marcucci R. Diabetes and sex: from pathophysiology to personalized medicine. Intern Emerg Med Suppl. 2012;7:S215–S219. doi: 10.1007/s11739-012-0804-y. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Agardh E, Allebeck P, Hallqvist J, Moradi T, Sidorchuk A. Type 2 diabetes incidence and socio-economic position: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Epidemiol. 2011;40:804–818. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyr029. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Anderson RN, Miniño AM, Hoyert DL, Rosenberg HM. Comparability of cause of death between ICD-9 and ICD-10: preliminary estimates. Natl Vital Stat Rep. 2001;49:1–28. - PubMed
    1. Annandale E. Part II: contemporary health inequalities. In: Annandale E, editor. The sociology of health and illness: a critical introduction. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers; 1998. pp. 87–192.
    1. Bachmann MO, Eachus J, Hopper CD, et al. Socio-economic inequalities in diabetes complications, control, attitudes and health service use: a cross-sectional study. Diabet Med. 2003;20:921–929. doi: 10.1046/j.1464-5491.2003.01050.x. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources