Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2015 Apr;24(2):107-13.
doi: 10.1017/S2045796015000086. Epub 2015 Mar 9.

Poverty, inequality and a political economy of mental health

Affiliations

Poverty, inequality and a political economy of mental health

J K Burns. Epidemiol Psychiatr Sci. 2015 Apr.

Abstract

The relationship between poverty and mental health is indisputable. However, to have an influence on the next set of sustainable global development goals, we need to understand the causal relationships between social determinants such as poverty, inequality, lack of education and unemployment; thereby clarifying which aspects of poverty are the key drivers of mental illness. Some of the major challenges identified by Lund (2014) in understanding the poverty-mental health relationship are discussed including: the need for appropriate poverty indicators; extending this research agenda to a broader range of mental health outcomes; the need to engage with theoretical concepts such as Amartya Sen's capability framework; and the need to integrate the concept of income/economic inequality into studies of poverty and mental health. Although income inequality is a powerful driver of poor physical and mental health outcomes, it features rarely in research and discourse on social determinants of mental health. This paper interrogates in detail the relationships between poverty, income inequality and mental health, specifically: the role of income inequality as a mediator of the poverty-mental health relationship; the relative utility of commonly used income inequality metrics; and the likely mechanisms underlying the impact of inequality on mental health, including direct stress due to the setting up of social comparisons as well as the erosion of social capital leading to social fragmentation. Finally, we need to interrogate the upstream political, social and economic causes of inequality itself, since these should also become potential targets in efforts to promote sustainable development goals and improve population (mental) health. In particular, neoliberal (market-oriented) political doctrines lead to both increased income inequality and reduced social cohesion. In conclusion, understanding the relationships between politics, poverty, inequality and mental health outcomes requires us to develop a robust, evidence-based 'political economy of mental health.'

Keywords: poverty.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Ahern J, Galea S. (2006). Social context and depression after a disaster: the role of income inequality. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health 60(9): 766–70. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Baker P, Kay A, Walls H. (2014) Trade and investment liberalization and Asia's noncommunicable disease epidemic: a synthesis of data and existing literature. Global Health 10(1): 66. [Epub ahead of print] - PMC - PubMed
    1. Baumgartner JN, Burns JK (2014). Measuring social inclusion – a key outcome in global mental health. International Journal of Epidemiology 43, 354–364. doi: i10.1093/ije/dyt224. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Boydell J, Van Os J, McKenzie K, Murray RM (2004). The association of inequality with the incidence of schizophrenia – an ecological study. Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology 39, 597–599. - PubMed
    1. Burns JK, Esterhuizen T (2008). Poverty, inequality and the treated incidence of first-episode psychosis – an ecological study from South Africa. Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology 43, 331–335. - PubMed