Magnetic Resonance Imaging Targeted Biopsy Improves Selection of Patients Considered for Active Surveillance for Clinically Low Risk Prostate Cancer Based on Systematic Biopsies
- PMID: 25747105
- DOI: 10.1016/j.juro.2015.02.2938
Magnetic Resonance Imaging Targeted Biopsy Improves Selection of Patients Considered for Active Surveillance for Clinically Low Risk Prostate Cancer Based on Systematic Biopsies
Abstract
Purpose: Current selection criteria for active surveillance based on systematic biopsy underestimate prostate cancer volume and grade. We investigated the role of additional magnetic resonance imaging targeted biopsy in reclassifying patients eligible for active surveillance based on systematic biopsy.
Materials and methods: We performed a study at 2 institutions in a total of 281 men with increased prostate specific antigen. All men met certain criteria, including 1) prebiopsy magnetic resonance imaging, 12-core transrectal systematic biopsy and 2 additional magnetic resonance imaging targeted biopsies of lesions suspicious for cancer during the same sequence as systematic biopsy, and 2) eligibility for active surveillance based on systematic biopsy results. Criteria for active surveillance were prostate specific antigen less than 10 ng/ml, no Gleason grade 4/5, 5 mm or less involvement of any biopsy core and 2 or fewer positive systematic biopsy cores. Patient characteristics were compared between reclassified and nonreclassified groups based on magnetic resonance imaging targeted biopsy results.
Results: On magnetic resonance imaging 58% of the 281 patients had suspicious lesions. Magnetic resonance imaging targeted biopsy was positive for cancer in 81 of 163 patients (50%). Of 281 patients 28 (10%) were reclassified by magnetic resonance imaging targeted biopsy as ineligible for active surveillance based on Gleason score in 8, cancer length in 20 and Gleason score plus cancer length in 9. Suspicious areas on magnetic resonance imaging were in the anterior part of the prostate in 15 of the 28 men (54%). Reclassified patients had a smaller prostate volume (37 vs 52 cc) and were older (66.5 vs 63 years) than those who were not reclassified (p < 0.05).
Conclusions: Magnetic resonance imaging targeted biopsy reclassified 10% of patients who were eligible for active surveillance based on systematic biopsy. Its incorporation into the active surveillance eligibility criteria may decrease the risk of reclassification to higher stages during followup.
Keywords: biopsy; diagnostic imaging; magnetic resonance imaging; prostatic neoplasms; watchful waiting.
Copyright © 2015 American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Similar articles
-
Prospective evaluation of magnetic resonance imaging guided in-bore prostate biopsy versus systematic transrectal ultrasound guided prostate biopsy in biopsy naïve men with elevated prostate specific antigen.J Urol. 2014 Nov;192(5):1374-9. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2014.05.090. Epub 2014 May 24. J Urol. 2014. PMID: 24866597 Clinical Trial.
-
Risk Stratification of Equivocal Lesions on Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging of the Prostate.J Urol. 2018 Mar;199(3):691-698. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2017.09.074. Epub 2017 Sep 20. J Urol. 2018. PMID: 28941924
-
The Efficacy of Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Magnetic Resonance Imaging Targeted Biopsy in Risk Classification for Patients with Prostate Cancer on Active Surveillance.J Urol. 2016 Aug;196(2):374-81. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2016.02.084. Epub 2016 Feb 23. J Urol. 2016. PMID: 26920465 Free PMC article.
-
MRI and surveillance.Curr Opin Urol. 2012 May;22(3):231-6. doi: 10.1097/MOU.0b013e328351dcf7. Curr Opin Urol. 2012. PMID: 22388665 Review.
-
Comparison of Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Transrectal Ultrasound Informed Prostate Biopsy for Prostate Cancer Diagnosis in Biopsy Naïve Men: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.J Urol. 2020 Jun;203(6):1085-1093. doi: 10.1097/JU.0000000000000595. Epub 2019 Oct 14. J Urol. 2020. PMID: 31609177
Cited by
-
MRI-targeted prostate biopsy: the next step forward!Med Pharm Rep. 2021 Apr;94(2):145-157. doi: 10.15386/mpr-1784. Epub 2021 Apr 29. Med Pharm Rep. 2021. PMID: 34013185 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Prediction of Grade Reclassification of Prostate Cancer Patients on Active Surveillance through the Combination of a Three-miRNA Signature and Selected Clinical Variables.Cancers (Basel). 2021 May 18;13(10):2433. doi: 10.3390/cancers13102433. Cancers (Basel). 2021. PMID: 34069838 Free PMC article.
-
MR-guided biopsy and focal therapy: new options for prostate cancer management.Curr Opin Urol. 2018 Mar;28(2):93-101. doi: 10.1097/MOU.0000000000000471. Curr Opin Urol. 2018. PMID: 29232269 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Advances in the selection of patients with prostate cancer for active surveillance.Nat Rev Urol. 2021 Apr;18(4):197-208. doi: 10.1038/s41585-021-00432-w. Epub 2021 Feb 23. Nat Rev Urol. 2021. PMID: 33623103 Review.
-
Update of the Standard Operating Procedure on the Use of Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging for the Diagnosis, Staging and Management of Prostate Cancer.J Urol. 2020 Apr;203(4):706-712. doi: 10.1097/JU.0000000000000617. Epub 2019 Oct 23. J Urol. 2020. PMID: 31642740 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous