Relationships between the pulmonary densitometry values obtained by CT and the forced oscillation technique parameters in patients with silicosis
- PMID: 25747897
- PMCID: PMC4628485
- DOI: 10.1259/bjr.20150028
Relationships between the pulmonary densitometry values obtained by CT and the forced oscillation technique parameters in patients with silicosis
Abstract
Objective: To evaluate the correlations between pulmonary densitometry values and forced oscillation technique (FOT) parameters in patients with silicosis.
Methods: This cross-sectional study comprised 36 non-smoker patients with silicosis and 20 matched control subjects who were submitted to FOT and multidetector CT (MDCT).
Results: Compared with the control subjects, the MDCT evaluation demonstrated that patients with silicosis exhibited greater total lung mass. These patients also had larger non-aerated and poorly aerated compartments, which included nodules and scarring. Compared with the control subjects, FOT evaluation demonstrated that patients with silicosis exhibited changes in both reactive and resistive properties of the respiratory system. In these patients, there was a greater heterogeneity of the respiratory system and increased work of breathing. Significant correlations between non-aerated compartment size and FOT parameters that reflect the non-homogeneity of the respiratory system were observed. The dynamic compliance of the respiratory system was negatively correlated with non-aerated compartment size, while the impedance at 4 Hz was positively correlated with non-aerated compartment size.
Conclusion: Patients with silicosis have heavier lungs. In these patients, a larger non-aerated compartment is associated with a worsening of lung function. A more significant pulmonary involvement is associated with a loss of homogeneity and increased mechanical load of the respiratory system. Advances in knowledge The findings provided by both pulmonary densitometry and FOT may add valuable information to the subjective analysis of silicosis; however, more studies are necessary to evaluate the potential use of these methods for assessing disease progression.
Figures
References
-
- Wagner GR. Asbestosis and silicosis. Lancet 1997; 349: 1311–15. - PubMed
-
- Lopes AJ, Costa W, Thomaz Mafort T, de Sá Ferreira A, Silveira de Menezes SL, Silva Guimarães F. Silicosis in sandblasters of shipyard versus silicosis in stone carvers in Brazil: a comparison of imaging findings, lung function variables and cardiopulmonary exercise testing parameters. [In English, Portuguese.] Rev Port Pneumol 2012; 18: 260–6. doi: 10.1016/j.rppneu.2012.04.006 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Ferreira AS, Moreira VB, Ricardo HM, Coutinho R, Gabetto JM, Marchiori E. Progressive massive fibrosis in silica-exposed workers. High-resolution computed tomography findings. [In English, Portuguese.] J Bras Pneumol 2006; 32: 523–8. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
